Electron orbiting proton-orbital radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter awertag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Radius
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating the orbital radius of an electron in the Bohr model, the initial calculation yielded a negative radius, indicating an error. The user corrected the formula and acknowledged the need to ensure the charge of the electron was properly accounted for. After adjustments, the radius was recalculated to be approximately 3.193e-10 meters, but the user expressed uncertainty about its accuracy. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying physics equations and understanding the implications of negative values in calculations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the challenges faced in solving orbital radius problems in atomic physics.
awertag
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Electron orbiting proton--orbital radius??

Homework Statement




In the Bohr model, the electron is imagined to move in a circular orbit about a stationary proton. If the speed of the electron were 8.9e5 m/s, what would be the corresponding orbital radius?

2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution
Fe=ma
a=Fe/m
(v^2)/r=(kqq/r)/m
v^2rm=kqq
(8.9e5)(r)(9.11e-31)=(9e9)(1.6e-19)(-1.6e-19)
r=-2.842e-4m

I hope you can help!

--aweg
 
Physics news on Phys.org


awertag said:

Homework Statement




In the Bohr model, the electron is imagined to move in a circular orbit about a stationary proton. If the speed of the electron were 8.9e5 m/s, what would be the corresponding orbital radius?

2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution
Fe=ma
a=Fe/m
(v^2)/r=(kqq/r2)/m
v^2rm=kqq
(8.9e5)2 (r)(9.11e-31)=(9e9)(1.6e-19)(-1.6e-19)
r=-2.842e-4m

I hope you can help!

--aweg
Some corrections are in red above.

Also, r should not be negative. There's one more error above which made r come out to be negative.

I assume you mean 10‒4 when you write e‒4, etc.
 


is the other error that i included the sign for electron charge?
 


ok well now i got r=3.193e-10 meters which is positive, so that's good...but I'm pretty sure it's not right, either
 


and yes e5 is x10^5
 


oh just kidding that was correct! :D thank you so much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top