Electrons impinging on a crystal

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy of electrons impinging on a crystal with a spacing of 0.4 nm using Bragg's law and De Broglie wavelength. The initial calculation yields an energy of 2.35 eV, which does not match expected options. Participants suggest that using a wavelength of 0.4 nm instead of the derived value would provide a more accurate estimate. This adjustment results in a momentum that is doubled and an energy that is approximately four times greater, leading to an estimated energy of around 10 eV. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using appropriate values for wavelength in relation to lattice spacing for accurate results.
tanaygupta2000
Messages
208
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Under certain conditions, a beam of electrons impinging on a crystal surface will diffract and a
scattering pattern of the beam can be obtained. What is the approximate kinetic energy of the electrons needed in order to the see the pattern?
(Assume the lattice spacing of the crystal to be 0.4 nm)
(a) 100 eV (b) 1 eV (c) 0.1 eV (d) 10 eV
Relevant Equations
Bragg's law. 2d sinθ = nλ
De-broglie wavelength, λ = h/p
Since the crystal spacing is given to be 0.4 nm, so d = 0.4 nm = 4e-10 m in Bragg's law formula
For θ = 90° & n = 1, I got λ = 2d = 8e-10 m

Using this value in De-broglie wavelength, I got p = h/λ = 8.28e-25

Now kinetic energy of the electrons is given by E = p^2/2m
Using value of p, I am getting E = 2.35 eV, which doesn't seem to match any option.
Where am I doing mistake?
Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
90o is extreme. An interference pattern can be observed for n = 1 with small ##\theta##.

The problem is asking for an approximate answer. The general idea is that you need ##\lambda## to be "on the order of" the lattice spacing. So, what energy do you get if you take ##\lambda = 0.4## nm?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Delta2
TSny said:
90o is extreme. An interference pattern can be observed for n = 1 with small ##\theta##.

The problem is asking for an approximate answer. The general idea is that you need ##\lambda## to be "on the order of" the lattice spacing. So, what energy do you get if you take ##\lambda = 0.4## nm?
p would get doubled and E would get 4 times, i.e., 4×2.35 eV = 9.4 eV ≈ 10 eV
 
  • Like
Likes TSny and Delta2
Thank You so much for the help !
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top