Electron's response to a oscillating Electric field.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the motion of an electron subjected to an oscillating electric field, described by the equation x(t) = (a0/ω)t - (a/ω)sin(ωt), where a0 = -eE0/m. The resulting motion exhibits both linear drift and oscillation, which challenges intuitive expectations about charge behavior in electric fields. Participants express confusion about the presence of a linear term alongside the oscillatory component in the position equation. The linear term is attributed to the inertia of the electron, indicating that its initial response to the electric field leads to a drift. This complex behavior highlights the nuanced dynamics of charged particles in varying electric fields.
Himanshu
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is to find the motion of the electron of charge -e and mass m which is initially at rest and which is suddenly subjected to an electric field E= E0sin(\omegat).

The following mathematical expression is safe and sound but I am having trouble with the Physics involved.x=(a0/\omega)t-(a/\omega)sin(\omegat).

where a0=-eE0/m.

The result x(t) is varying linearly as well as oscillating in time. This means that the electron is responding to the electric field in a manner which jiggling as well as drifting away.

That's against our intuition. A charge should respond in accordance to the electric field. So what is happening here.

My speculation is that the drifting motion is due to the inertia of the electron and that the motion was due to the initial electric field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Himanshu said:
The problem is to find the motion of the electron of charge -e and mass m which is initially at rest and which is suddenly subjected to an electric field E= E0sin(\omegat).

x=(a0/\omega)t-(a/\omega)sin(\omegat).

where a0=-eE0/m.

The result x(t) is varying linearly as well as oscillating in time. This means that the electron is responding to the electric field in a manner which jiggling as well as drifting away.

That's against our intuition

Hi Himanshu! :smile:

(have an omega: ω :smile:)

Why isn't it just (a0/ω)cos(ωt) ? :confused:
 
I cannot understand. How does the above expression appears? Can you please elaborate.
 
Don't mean to revive an old thread, but the physics behind this situation is confusing me as well. The acceleration is purely sinusoidal, varying with time, but the position somehow has a linear term in there as well as a sine. What's the physical explanation for this?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top