Elements of an Equivalence Class

Numberphile
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical physics forums, so no HH Template is shown >

Question:
Let ~ be the equivalence relation on the set ℤ of integers defined by a~b if a-b is divisible by 5. Let k ∈ Em belong to the equivalence class of m, and l ∈ En belong to the equivalence class of n. Prove that the product kl belongs to the equivalence class Emn.

What I've tried:
Since k ∈ Em, then m - k = 5x, for x ∈ ℤ.
Also, since l ∈ En, then n - l = 5y, for y ∈ ℤ.
So, I need to show that m*n - k*l = 5z, for z ∈ ℤ.
I've tried multiplying (m-k)*(n-l), but to no avail.
So I tried one case. Let m=20, k=10, n=30, and l=5.
Well, 20-10=5(2), so 10 ∈ E20, and 30-5=5(5), so 5 ∈ E30
Also, 600-50=5(110), so 50 ∈ E600, which for this case means kl ∈ Emn.

Dilemma:
I'm convinced the product kl belongs to the equivalence class of m*n always, so I'm having trouble actually finding a systematic way of proving it in general, instead of using a specific case.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Numberphile said:
Question:
Let ~ be the equivalence relation on the set ℤ of integers defined by a~b if a-b is divisible by 5. Let k ∈ Em belong to the equivalence class of m, and l ∈ En belong to the equivalence class of n. Prove that the product kl belongs to the equivalence class Emn.

What I've tried:
Since k ∈ Em, then m - k = 5x, for x ∈ ℤ.
Also, since l ∈ En, then n - l = 5y, for y ∈ ℤ.
So, I need to show that m*k - n*l = 5z, for z ∈ ℤ.
I've tried multiplying (m-k)*(n-l), but to no avail.
So I tried one case. Let m=20, k=10, n=30, and l=5.
Well, 20-10=5(2), so 10 ∈ E20, and 30-5=5(5), so 5 ∈ E30
Also, 600-50=5(110), so 50 ∈ E600, which for this case means kl ∈ Emn.

Dilemma:
I'm convinced the product kl belongs to the equivalence class of m*n always, so I'm having trouble actually finding a systematic way of proving it in general, instead of using a specific case.
Why haven't you calculated what you are actually looking for: ##m\cdot n - k \cdot l##?
 
I haven't calculated that because I'm not sure what that would represent.
I know an equivalence class is defined as a relation on a set S with x ∈ S, then the equivalence class of x is
Ex = {y ∈ S | x ~ y}
 
Numberphile said:
I haven't calculated that because I'm not sure what that would represent.
Here's the answer:
Numberphile said:
So, I need to show that m*k - n*l = 5z, for z ∈ ℤ
And here's the way:
Numberphile said:
Since k ∈ Em, then m - k = 5x, for x ∈ ℤ.
Also, since l ∈ En, then n - l = 5y, for y ∈ ℤ.
##mk-kl = (5x+k)(5y+l)-kl= \dots ##
 
I may have made a mistake in my "What I've tried" section.
I already corrected it in my original post.

It should have read
show that m*n - k*l = 5z, for z ∈ ℤ.

My apologies.
 
Numberphile said:
I may have made a mistake in my "What I've tried" section.
I already corrected it in my original post.

It should have readMy apologies.
No, my sorry, I had a typo. Of course it's ##mn-kl=(5x-k)(5y-l)-kl= \dots##
The point is: you already have everything you need in your post. What is ##mn-kl##?
 
I'm not sure that I follow the logic.
mn - kl = (5x+k)(5y+l) - kl

I expanded this, and trivially, I obtain that mn - kl = mn - kl
 
Numberphile said:
I'm not sure that I follow the logic.
mn - kl = (5x+k)(5y+l) - kl

I expanded this, and trivially, I obtain that mn - kl = mn - kl
You set ##m=5x-k## and ##n=5y-l## which you can do because ##k\in E_m## and ##l\in E_n##.
This is correct. Also correct is, that ##mn-kl=5z## for some ##z \in \mathbb{Z}## has to be shown, because it would mean ##E_{mn}=E_{kl}## what we need. Now, simply substitute ##m## and ##n## to get
##mn-kl=(5x-k)(5y-l)-kl=25xy-5xl-5yk+kl-kl=25xy-5xl-5yk=5z##.
This line was all what's been missing.
 
Ah, I see it now! (Though I think the signs are a bit off, but nonetheless it should be the same)

Since 25xy + 5xl + 5yk = 5(5xy) + 5(xl) + 5(yk) = 5[5xy + xl +yk], then this is just an 5z, as [5xy + xl + yk] is just some integer.

Perfect! Thank you so much.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
Back
Top