EM wave described using a sine function.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation for electromagnetic (EM) waves, specifically Asin(kx - ωt), and the confusion surrounding the inclusion of both position (x) and time (t). The original poster mistakenly believes that these variables cancel each other out, resulting in a constant value of zero. However, it is clarified that while certain combinations of x and t may yield zero, the equation actually describes oscillations that vary with both position and time. The amplitude of the wave can fluctuate between -A and A at any given point, indicating that the field is not constant. Understanding the relationship between k, ω, x, and t is crucial for accurately interpreting the behavior of EM waves.
Darren93
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I'm going through my notes and I don't understand how they have included position in an equation to describe an EM wave. The equation is of the form http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/f/6/3/f6386c1751b91ec23c7123b15a11b52f.png [Asin(kx-ωt)]. This equation is just stated in my notes and there is no description of where this came from. Surely if you input both position and time in this manor they both cancel each other out and you always get sin(0). Like at x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/4. Then kx-ωt=π/2-π/2 = 0. It's the same for every value of t and x, always 0? I mean I could understand using either Asin(kx) or Asin(ωt) but does both in the same equation not cancel each other out? What am I missing?

[link to wikipedia page about this description: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_wave#General_form ]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would kx-ωt be always 0? In this case x would be the position where you measure the field, which can be any point and t is the time when you measure it, which can be any time.You will of course have some points where the amplitude is 0 at any given time but not all.
 
Well all the values I use I end up getting kx-ωt=0. That's the problem it shouldn't always be zero. It should be zero for x=0,λ,2λ and ect. However x=λ/4 should give kx-ωt= π/2. When I tried calculating this for x=λ/4 I got:

x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/4
kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ/4)-(2π/T)*(T/4)
kx-ωt=(π/2)-(π/2)
kx-ωt=0

So I'm doing something wrong but what? I suspect its the values of k,ω or t I'm using but I really don't know.
 
Darren93 said:
Well all the values I use I end up getting kx-ωt=0

Then you are using very few values.

x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/4
kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ/4)-(2π/T)*(T/4)
kx-ωt=(π/2)-(π/2)
kx-ωt=0

but after T/4
x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/2

kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ/4)-(2π/T)*(T/2)
kx-ωt=(π/2)-(π)
kx-ωt=-3n/2

or at another position at the same time

x=λ, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/4
kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ)-(2π/T)*(T/4)
kx-ωt=(2π)-(π/2)
kx-ωt=-3n/2

or any other time δt
x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=δt
kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ/4)-(2π/T)*δt
kx-ωt=(π/2)-(2πδt/T)The field at any point x will oscillate between -A,0,A in time. You can always find a time when the field is -A,A at a given point but that does not mean that it is constant in time.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top