Energy considerations in LC oscillations. How is it in SHM?

AI Thread Summary
In an LC circuit, oscillations occur due to the charge and discharge of the capacitor, with energy being stored in the inductor. To prove that these oscillations are simple harmonic motion (SHM), one can derive a second-order differential equation that aligns with the harmonic oscillator's equation. The discussion also addresses the conservation of energy in undamped oscillations, noting that energy transfers between the capacitor and inductor without loss. By calculating the energy stored in both components at different time intervals, one can demonstrate that the total energy remains constant. The focus is on mathematically proving energy conservation in the system.
weirdo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

When you set up an LC (tank) circuit there is oscillation due to charge and discharge of capactor and storage of energy in the inductor.

How do you prove that it is simple harmonic? And also how do you prove (mathematically) energy is conserved in an undamped LC oscillation?


Homework Equations


For C: emf= q/c
For L: emf= -L (dI/dt)


The Attempt at a Solution


emf across C=emf across L
ie, q/c + L (dI/dt) = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By setting up an equation of the voltage, using the relevant formulas you've already given, you come to a second order differential equation that, outside of different constants, is equivalent to the second order DE of the harmonic oscillator.
 
Fine thanks. I got the bit on proving it to be in SHM. How should I start to prove that total energy is conserved in a mathematical way?

I can say let at t=0s, energy of system in in C, E= 1/2 CV2 -->1
after 1/4 the time period, energy is fully in inductor, E= 1/2 LI2 --> 2

So Etotal = 1 + 2.

How do I show it is constant for undamped oscillations?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top