Energy lost from a Flywheel to the Environment

AI Thread Summary
A flywheel with a mass of 100 kg and a radius of gyration of 1200 mm initially rotates at 150 rpm, possessing a kinetic energy of 17.75 J. After impacting a second flywheel rotating at 80 rpm, the kinetic energy is reduced by 20%, resulting in energy lost to the surroundings of 3.55 J. The mass of the second flywheel, with a radius of gyration of 800 mm, is calculated to be 157.2 kg. The impact is deemed inelastic because energy is lost, and both flywheels move in the same direction post-impact. The discussion also raises a question about the use of "K" for radius and the moment of inertia formula for a solid disk.
Poch
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. A Flywheel (A) mass 100kg and radius of gyration 1200mm rotates 150rpm clockwise. The knetic energy of this flywheel is to be reduced 20% by impacting a second flywheel B rotating at 80 rpm in opposite direction, such that they have the same clockwise angular velocity after inpact. A) calclate mass of flywheel B if its radius of gyration is 800mm, B. calculate energey lost to the surroundings, C. is the impact elastic, give reasons



2. KE = 0.5 x I x W^2, I = M x K^2,



3. K = 1.2m
W = 150 rpm = 15.7 r/s
M = 100kg
I = MxK^2, I = 100 x 1.2^2 , I = 144

Flywheel A
KE = 0.5 x I x W^2
=0.5 x 144 x 15.7^2
= 17747.28 = 17.75J

-20% = 17.75 = 14.2 J

Energy lost = 3.55J, this is acquired by Flywheel B
Flywheel B 80rpm = 8.4 r/s
KE = 0.5 IW^2
I = KE x 2 / w^2
I = 3550 x 2 / 8.4^2
= 100.62 Kgm^2

Mass, I = M x K^2
M = I / K^2 = 100.62 / 0.8^2
=157.2kg

(Check – I = K^2M, 0.8^2 x 157.2 = 100.6)

B). Energy lost to the surroundings

Kinetic Energy before impact 17.75J – Kinetic Energy after impact 14.2J

17.75 – 14.2 = 3.55J

C). No it is inelastic as energy is given up and the 2 bodies move in the same direction at the same speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a question for us? Well, anyway, here's an observation:

Are you really using "K" for radius? How bizarre!

Moment of inertia for a solid disk is not I=mr^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top