Energy of Earth Orbiting Around the Sun

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential energy, kinetic energy, and total energy of the Earth at its closest and farthest distances from the Sun. Initial calculations for average distance and velocity were incorrect, leading to unrealistic results. Correcting these, the average distance was recalculated to 1.496 x 10^11 m, yielding a more realistic average velocity of 30,000 m/s. The average kinetic energy was found to be 2.7 x 10^33 J, while the average potential energy was calculated as -5.3 x 10^33 J, leading to a total energy of -2.7 x 10^33 J. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using precise values for calculations rather than averages that may not apply to the specific extremes being analyzed.
Ishaan S
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Earth's distance from the sun varies from 1.471 x 108 km to 1.521 x 108 km during the year. Determine the difference in (a) the potential energy, (b) the earth's kinetic energy, and (c) the total energy between these extreme points. Take the sun to be at rest.

Homework Equations


FGrav = (GMm)/r2

U = integral(a→b)(GMm/r2)dr

KE = .5mv2

Law of the Conservation of energy: Ei = Ef

ac = v2 / r

The Attempt at a Solution



I got (a) easily. I need help with b and c, though.

I tried taking the average distance from the sun, which is just the length of the semi-major axis, which is

1.521 x 108 km - 1.471 x 108 km = 5.00 x 109 m = rave

Then I used the centripetal acceleration formula to get

Fa = FG = (GMsun / (rave)2) = (v2)ave/rave.

Solving for vave I get

vave = 2.7 x 1010 m/s.

I then calculated average kinetic energy to be

.5 * mearth * (vave)2 = 2.1 * 1045 J.
Average gravitational energy would be

-GMm/rave = -1.6 * 1035 J.

Average total energy would be average kinetic + average potential.

Since energy is constant the average energy is constant for instantaneous energy.

Therefore, at perihelion and aphelion, I would have average total energy - potential energy at the point, correct?

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ishaan S said:

Homework Statement


The Earth's distance from the sun varies from 1.471 x 108 km to 1.521 x 108 km during the year. Determine the difference in (a) the potential energy, (b) the earth's kinetic energy, and (c) the total energy between these extreme points. Take the sun to be at rest.

Homework Equations


FGrav = (GMm)/r2

U = integral(a→b)(GMm/r2)dr

KE = .5mv2

Law of the Conservation of energy: Ei = Ef

ac = v2 / r

The Attempt at a Solution



I got (a) easily. I need help with b and c, though.

I tried taking the average distance from the sun, which is just the length of the semi-major axis, which is

1.521 x 108 km - 1.471 x 108 km = 5.00 x 109 m = rave

This calculation makes no sense. How can you subtract two positive numbers and have the difference be greater than either number?

Also, it's not even how you calculate an average distance.

Then I used the centripetal acceleration formula to get

Fa = FG = (GMsun / (rave)2) = (v2)ave/rave.

Solving for vave I get

vave = 2.7 x 1010 m/s.

Really? What's the speed of light in a vacuum? Do you have the Earth going faster or slower than light itself?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light

I then calculated average kinetic energy to be

.5 * mearth * (vave)2 = 2.1 * 1045 J.
Average gravitational energy would be

-GMm/rave = -1.6 * 1035 J.

Average total energy would be average kinetic + average potential.

Since energy is constant the average energy is constant for instantaneous energy.

Therefore, at perihelion and aphelion, I would have average total energy - potential energy at the point, correct?

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

Correct your mistakes as pointed out above.
 
OK.

The mean distance is (1.521*108 km + 1.471*108 km)/2 = 1.496*108 km = 1.496*1011 m.

Then the average velocity comes from the centripetal acceleration formula:

Fa = FG = GM/(rave)2 = (vave)2 / rave

Solve for vave

vave = 30,000 m/s.

So average KE = ,5mvave2 = 2.7*1033 J.

Average potential energy is

-GMm/rave = -5.3 * 1033 J.

So total energy is U + KE = -2.7*1033 J.

So at perihelion the KE would be

Etotal - (-GMm/rclosest distance) = 2.8*1033 J.

At aphelion the KE would be

Etotal - (-GMm/rfar distance) = 2.6*1033 J.

Is this correct?
 
I do not understand how an 'average' distance could be helpful in answering the question. Just find the PE and KE at the given extremes.
Further, it is not clear what would be meant by an average distance from the sun. Taking the average of the two extreme distances is unlikely to produce anything useful. An integral would make more sense, but even then there are choices to be made. You could take an average over time, or an average over theta, etc.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top