Energy of two fermions in a three-dimensional box

Skrien
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two particles of mass m are placed in a rectangular box with sides a>b>c (note 3D-box). The particles interact with each other with a potential V=A\delta(\mathbf{r}_1-\mathbf{r}_2) and are in their ground state (1s). Use first order perturbation theory to find the systems energy in two cases:

<br /> \begin{cases}<br /> a ) \text{ The particles are fermions with anti-parallel spins}\\<br /> b) \text{ The particles are fermions with parallel spins}<br /> \end{cases}<br />

Homework Equations


I'm having trouble finding the explicit spin wave-function, what is the total wave function for my two particle system? I need an explicit expression for which I can perform the integral, I have only found implicit expression such as &#039;&#039;\chi(s_1,s_2)&#039;&#039;. What is this function in my case?

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I've concluded that the state in b) is impossible because of the Pauli exclusion principle. In a) I have written down the hamiltonian as
<br /> H=H_0+H&#039;=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_1}\nabla_1^2-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_2}\nabla_2^2+A\delta(\mathbf{r}_1-\mathbf{r}_2).<br />
where H' is the interacting potential which is considered the perturbation. The first order correction to the energy is
E_{n_1n_2}^{(1)}=&lt;\psi_{n_1n_2}|H&#039;|\psi_{n_1n_2}&gt;

The wave-function for one particle in a box without consideration to spin is quite straight forward, however, I can't seem to grasp the concept of spin-wave function.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Skrien said:
I'm having trouble finding the explicit spin wave-function, what is the total wave function for my two particle system? I need an explicit expression for which I can perform the integral, I have only found implicit expression such as &#039;&#039;\chi(s_1,s_2)&#039;&#039;. What is this function in my case?
The integral over the spin components is trivial, as it is not a function of r1 or r2. The only thing that will be important is that it is normalized and (hint) its symmetry.

Skrien said:
So far I've concluded that the state in b) is impossible because of the Pauli exclusion principle.
My reading of the problem is that the particles are in the ground state internally, but not necessarily in the ground state of the box (because the designation 1s has nothing to do with the box). I would find an appropriate spatial wave function where the Pauli principle is obeyed.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top