Engineering Statics - Moments problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the moment Mo of a 1.2 kN force about the axis O-O, with initial calculations yielding a moment of -349.05 Nm, which contradicts the expected +327 Nm. Participants identify that the r-vector should be BA instead of AB, leading to confusion about when to use each vector. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding force directions at different points, specifically how forces exerted on points A and B differ in sign. Additionally, there is a note on the nature of forces in cables and strings, emphasizing that they exert longitudinal forces. The thread concludes with a request for clarification on the correct application of vector notation in moment calculations.
yugeci
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have attached the diagram. The question says "Compute the Moment Mo of the 1.2kN force about the axis O-O.

Homework Equations



M = r x F
AB = OB - OA
Resolving forces, Fx = F cos Θ.. Fy = F sin Θ etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



Here are the axes I've made, using the Right Hand Rule:

jPQSfyR.png


OA = (-300, 0, 105)
OB = (0, 0, 200)

So AB = (300, 0, 95) .. this is the r vector.

For the F vector, Fz = 1.2 sin 60 = 1.04 kN
Fxy = 1.2 cos 60 = 0.6 kN

Fx = -0.6 cos 50 = -0.39 kN
Fy = 0.6 sin 50 = 0.46 kN

M = r x F (since we need the moment about the O-O axis, I'll just get the j component).

| 300 0 95 |
| -0.39 0.46 1.04 |

Solving gives M @ o-o as -349.05 Nm. However the answer is +327 Nm. What have I done wrong?
 

Attachments

  • problem.png
    problem.png
    18.2 KB · Views: 936
Physics news on Phys.org
I am missing why the y-component of the r-vector should be zero...
[Edit] sorry, axes mixed up. Will re-do.
 
Last edited:
Turns out you also have something mixed up (means we're even...):

The r-vector is BA, not AB, so (-300, 0, -95)​

Doesn't help us to find a different value, though. Checked a few times.

So have some confidence in your result (and tell me what we did wrong once you find out :smile:).
 
It turns out that we are right, I think. The original question (older edition) was in lb-in, and I guess there was some error when the values got converted to N-mm. You are right that we need the BA vector instead of AB.. but that's just a sign change.. which leads me to my next question?

When do we use AB, and when do we use BA (the reverse)? Here are two example questions:

awJi4GD.png


In the first we use BA. In the second we use AB.

Thanks in advance.
 
Help? :\
 
The word "on" is key here!

Antenna case:
On point B a force pulls in the direction BA. (So that force will have a positive z-component, positive y, negative x). But on point A the cable to B exercises a force that is in the direction AB (so all components opposite sign).
Can't say i like the picture very much, because the y-coordinate of B is pretty vague.
Does the exercise continue with something that involves assuming that on point A the sum of forces has no x- and y-components?

Turnbuckle case :
On point A which is part of member AD a force pulls in the direction AB. (So that force will have a negative z-component, positive x, positive y)

Help? :\
was out of town & off line in the weekend. Happens ;-)

PS Generally: nice pictures!

PS strings, rubber bands, springs, ropes, cables: in simple cases they are supposed to exercise longitudinal (in line, as opposed to transversal, perpendicular to..) forces (otherwise the ends would move sideways).
The forces on a string, cable, section of string, etc. point outwards, the forces the string, cable, etc. exercises on the stuff attached point "inwards". If the rope itself is weightless AND is not accelerated, all are equal in magnitude.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top