Enthelpy and Isentropic compression/expansion

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the discrepancies in calculating the specific work done by an isentropic pump in an ideal Rankine cycle using two different formulas. The calculations for a compressor operating between specified pressures and enthalpies yielded vastly different results: 388,670 J/kg using enthalpy differences and 488.16 J/kg using the volume and pressure difference. The confusion arises from the assumption that water is a saturated liquid at both states, while in reality, the process is isentropic, indicating that the water at state 2 is a compressed liquid. This misunderstanding of the state of the water leads to the significant difference in calculated work. Clarifying the state of the fluid in each calculation is essential for accurate results.
RoRoRo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a certain thermodynamics textbook, specific work done by an isentropic compressor/pump in an ideal rankine cycles, is given by the following;

Wpump = h2 - h1
Wpump = v(P2 - P1), where v = v1

When I carry out these two calculations between any two states, I get vastly different answers.

For example, compressor in a rankine cycle operating between the following conditions for saturated water;

P1 = 20 kPa
v1 = 0.001017 m3/kg
h1 = 251.42 kJ/kg

P2 = 500 kPa
h2 = 640.09 kJ/kg

Wpump = h2 - h1 = 640090 - 251420 = 388 670 J/kg

Wpump in = v(P2 - P1) = 0.001017 ( 500000 - 20000 ) = 488.16 J/kg

I assume that I'm missing something. Is there any explanation for why I'm seeing such a huge discrepancy in results for two supposedly equivalent expressions?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Is the liquid water saturated in both states?
 
I was assuming that the water was a saturated liquid at both states but because the process is isentropic, its actually a compressed liquid at state 2. I think...
 
RoRoRo said:
I was assuming that the water was a saturated liquid at both states but because the process is isentropic, its actually a compressed liquid at state 2. I think...
Correct.
 
Measuring the temperatures of bright (visible spectrum) cosmic objects would use spectral analysis. But temperatures of IR (warm / hot) radiators is done using Stefan's Law with radiometric cameras. There seems no reason why suitable filters couldn't be used to find the black body temperature using the ratio of two measured intensities after the fashion of colour TV cameras. Why? Could it be to do with the actual size of IR filters to mount on a two channel image sensor array? I'm sure there...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K