Entropy of a quantum sized material

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the entropy of a quantum-sized material with specific energy levels and total energy. The user is confused about determining the value of "N" in the multiplicity equation, initially assuming it to be 18 based on the total energy and energy level spacing. Despite this assumption, their calculations did not yield the correct entropy value. The user seeks clarification on whether their approach is valid and if the multiplicity equation is necessary for solving the problem. The thread highlights the challenges in applying statistical mechanics concepts to quantum systems.
phoenix133231
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small material has quantum oscillator energy levels 2E-23 J apart. Suppose the material has a total energy of 34E-23 J and contains 5 atoms. Find the entropy of the material.


Homework Equations


Entropy = (Boltzmann's constant)*ln(multiplicity)

Multiplicity = (q + N - 1)!/[q!(N-1)!]


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having trouble grasping the question. The 5 atoms are understood, but I'm having trouble finding the "N" for the multiplicity equation.

So, I came up with N = 18, because the total energy is 34E-23 J and the energy levels are 2E-23 J apart, and q = 5.

Then applying the multiplicity equation and plugging it to entropy, I didn't get the correct answer.

Am I on the correct path to find N, or do I even need the multiplicity equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone, please?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top