Schools Environmental Engineering undergrad to Nuclear Engineering grad school.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of transitioning from Environmental Engineering to Nuclear Engineering for graduate studies. It highlights that while a direct path from Environmental Engineering to Nuclear Engineering is uncommon, it is possible with the right prerequisites. Key prerequisites for nuclear engineering graduate programs typically include foundational courses in physics, thermodynamics, and reactor physics. Students are encouraged to take additional courses such as modern physics and electives in related fields to strengthen their applications. Mechanical or Chemical Engineering are suggested as viable alternatives if transitioning to Nuclear Engineering proves difficult, as these disciplines often share relevant coursework. The conversation emphasizes the importance of acquiring a diverse skill set, including CAD, FEA, and CFD, to enhance employability in nuclear engineering and related fields. Overall, while a background in Environmental Engineering may require additional coursework to meet nuclear engineering program requirements, it is feasible to pursue this path with careful planning.
Broke186
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How feasible would this be? I'll be an Environmental Engineering sophomore this coming semester and was wondering how a path to Nuclear Engineering for graduate school would look like, if the path exists at all. I suppose that I could switch to Mechanical Engineering (having done most of the basic core like UP1 and 2, Cal 1, Chem1 and 2 already) since that may contain better prospects, but I really like Environmental Engineering so far. What are the prerequisites for applying to most nuclear engineering grad programs? Are there certain additional courses I can take to help meet some of these requirements(like modern physics and such?) or do most grad schools look for nuclear engineering undergraduates for consideration into their graduate programs? Thanks in advance for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was in the same boat as you about a year ago, I couldn't decide between environmental or nuclear engineering. I ended up going into chemical engineering because Its extremely versatile and I can see it being applicable in both fields.

If you can't get into a Nuke undergrad program, Mechanical or Chemical is probably your next best choice if you want to pursue nuclear engineering. It seems to me that most schools have their environmental program rooted in the civil engineering department. At my school, its part of the chemical department, if that's the case for you, then you'll probably be fine.
 
Yeah, it's rooted in the Civil Engineering department.
 
Broke186 said:
How feasible would this be? I'll be an Environmental Engineering sophomore this coming semester and was wondering how a path to Nuclear Engineering for graduate school would look like, if the path exists at all. I suppose that I could switch to Mechanical Engineering (having done most of the basic core like UP1 and 2, Cal 1, Chem1 and 2 already) since that may contain better prospects, but I really like Environmental Engineering so far. What are the prerequisites for applying to most nuclear engineering grad programs? Are there certain additional courses I can take to help meet some of these requirements(like modern physics and such?) or do most grad schools look for nuclear engineering undergraduates for consideration into their graduate programs? Thanks in advance for any help
Generally a graduate nuclear engineering program is a continuation of an undergrad nuclear engineering program. An engineering major coming from another scientific or engineering discipline would be expected to take some remedial courses to fill in the holes of knowledge.

In the nuclear engineering undergrad programs, there are basic core courses in mechanical engineering, e.g., thermodynamics, solid mechanics, heat transfer, and fluid mechanics. One could also take electives in corrosion, power systems, turbomachinery, and material science/engineering.

Then there is the set of core nuclear engineering courses, normally introductory nuclear physics, reactor physics, radiation physics (e.g., shielding and radiation effects on materials), and usually a power plant design course. There are also numerous electives, e.g., nuclear plant safey, fuel cycle economics, fusion engineering, . . . .

Some people may take a course in environmental aspects of nuclear energy, or radiation protection.

In my undergrad program, our curriculum had a requirement for EE - including circuit analysis (basic EE course), and electromechanics (transformers, generators and motors). I also took an elective in control theory (in EE). There was also a control theory course offered in the Aerospace Engineering department.

In a graduate engineering course, one would be expected to take a more advanced course in reactor physics, which would include more advanced level of reactor dynamics. The prerequiste is an undergraduate course in reactor physics.

For anyone going into nuclear engineering, or aerospace or mechanical, I'd recommend picking up a skill set including CAD/CAE, FEA (finite element analysis), and CFD (computationall fluid dynamics). Usually one gets CAD experience in an undergrad program.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top