Equation of Motion for a Projectile Under Quadratic Air Resistance

In summary: I rearrange this equation you get:v / [(c/mg)(v^3/3) + v^2] ?Yes. so will it be:v / [(c/mg)(v^3/3) + v^2] ?
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Why is du divided by 2?
 
  • #38
Oblio said:
Ok, we went from tf-ti = [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\frac{-mdv}{mg(1+(c/mg)v^2}[/tex]

Bring out the constants [tex]\frac{-m}{mg}[/tex]


=[tex]\frac{-m}{mg}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{dv}{1+(c/mg)v^2}[/tex]

the numerator and denominator are factored out above...

Yeah, let's cancel out the m's... leaving:

[tex]\frac{-1}{g}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{dv}{1+(c/mg)v^2}[/tex]

The idea is now I want this integral to look like:

[tex]\int\frac{dx}{1+x^2}[/tex]

for that we need to substitute a new variable instead of v...

If I let u = [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}*v[/tex], then the denominator is 1+(c/mg)v^2 = 1+u^2... does this part make sense?
 
  • #39
Oblio said:
Why is du divided by 2?

du = 2xdx

du/2 = xdx

so they substitute in du/2 instead of xdx.
 
  • #40
learningphysics said:
Yeah, let's cancel out the m's... leaving:

[tex]\frac{-1}{g}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{dv}{1+(c/mg)v^2}[/tex]

The idea is now I want this integral to look like:

[tex]\int\frac{dx}{1+x^2}[/tex]

for that we need to substitute a new variable instead of v...

If I let u = [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}*v[/tex], then the denominator is 1+(c/mg)v^2 = 1+u^2... does this part make sense?

u = [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}*v[/tex]
= u^2 = (c/mg)v^2

Yep. I get it!
 
  • #41
I just changed it, you may have already started replying to my dumb mistake before the edit. :P
 
  • #42
learningphysics said:
du = 2xdx

du/2 = xdx

so they substitute in du/2 instead of xdx.

right. duh.
I'm going to stab my brain with a q-tip.
 
  • #43
Shouldn't the du integrate into a u?
 
  • #44
Oblio said:
Shouldn't the du integrate into a u?

write out the integral after substituting in u...
 
  • #45
Oblio said:
right. duh.
I'm going to stab my brain with a q-tip.

lol. :smile: don't be so hard on yourself.
 
  • #46
so you'd have:

u^76*u*1/152

=(u^76*x^2+5) / 152
 
  • #47
Oblio said:
so you'd have:

u^76*u*1/152

=(u^76*x^2+5) / 152

no... du doesn't integrate to u...

When you have an integral:

let's say:

[tex]\int5xdx[/tex]

What you are taking the anti-derivative of is 5x... so the answer would be (5/2)x^2.

same way:

[tex]\int u^{75}(du/2) = \int \frac{u^{75}}{2} du[/tex]

You take the anti-derivative of u^75/2 to get your answer.
 
  • #48
Ok, got it. It's more of a notation.

Yeah I follow your online example now.
 
  • #49
learningphysics said:
Yeah, let's cancel out the m's... leaving:

[tex]\frac{-1}{g}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{dv}{1+(c/mg)v^2}[/tex]

The idea is now I want this integral to look like:

[tex]\int\frac{dx}{1+x^2}[/tex]

for that we need to substitute a new variable instead of v...

If I let u = [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}*v[/tex], then the denominator is 1+(c/mg)v^2 = 1+u^2... does this part make sense?

So, if u = [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}*v[/tex]

How do we still end up with [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}[/tex] outside the integral as well?
 
  • #50
Oblio said:
So, if u = [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}*v[/tex]

How do we still end up with [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}[/tex] outside the integral as well?

we not only need to substitute u... we also need to take care of the dv, and get du instead...

so:

du = [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}*dv[/tex]

dv = [tex]\frac{du}{\sqrt{c/mg}}[/tex]

So substitute that into the integral for dv...

what do you get for the integral now?
 
  • #51
Oblio said:
Ok, got it. It's more of a notation.

Yeah, for the most part...
Yeah I follow your online example now.
cool.
 
  • #52
learningphysics said:
we not only need to substitute u... we also need to take care of the dv, and get du instead...

so:

du = [tex]\sqrt{c/mg}*dv[/tex]

dv = [tex]\frac{du}{\sqrt{c/mg}}[/tex]

So substitute that into the integral for dv...

what do you get for the integral now?

[tex]\frac{-m}{mg}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\frac{\frac{du}{sqrt[c/mg]}}{1 + c/mg* v^2}[/tex]
 
  • #53
Oblio said:
[tex]\frac{-m}{mg}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\frac{\frac{du}{sqrt[c/mg]}}{1 + c/mg* v^2}[/tex]

yes, but you also need the u substitution...
 
  • #54
You mean du?
 
  • #55
Oblio said:
You mean du?

you've taken care of the du... but you still have v in the integral... you want u... we had it before

1+u^2
 
  • #56
Oblio said:
[tex]\frac{-m}{mg}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\frac{\frac{du}{sqrt[c/mg]}}{1 + c/mg* v^2}[/tex]

right...

[tex]\frac{-m}{mg}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\frac{\frac{du}{sqrt[c/mg]}}{1+ u^2}[/tex]
 
  • #57
Oblio said:
right...

[tex]\frac{-m}{mg}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\frac{\frac{du}{sqrt[c/mg]}}{1+ u^2}[/tex]

exactly... now take all the constants outside the integral... and we get:

[tex]-\sqrt{\frac{m}{gc}}\int\frac{du}{1+u^2}[/tex]

now we can apply arctan...
 
  • #58
Do you treat the integral sign almost as an equality when moving things in and out?
 
  • #59
Oblio said:
Do you treat the integral sign almost as an equality when moving things in and out?

not like an equal sign... more like a parentheses...

ie: 4x^2y+8xy = 4(x^2y + 2xy) = 4xy(x+2)

it's the same way I'm moving out the constants...
 
  • #60
Ok because I am having trouble matching what you got taking out the last constants
 
  • #61
what step did you take?
 
  • #62
Oblio said:
Ok because I am having trouble matching what you got taking out the last constants

show me what you get... I might have made a mistake.
 
  • #63
One more question first, how do we treat it like a parantheses, when you don't really have anything outside the 'bracket' to multiply or divide, in the simplification process.

I tried lots of things, but logically I'm not sure the proper logic behind taking out those constants when there's no 'other side' to multiply/divide etc...
know what i mean?
 
  • #64
Oblio said:
One more question first, how do we treat it like a parantheses, when you don't really have anything outside the 'bracket' to multiply or divide, in the simplification process.

I tried lots of things, but logically I'm not sure the proper logic behind taking out those constants when there's no 'other side' to multiply/divide etc...
know what i mean?

I'm not sure I understand... for example:

[tex]\int5xdx = 5\int xdx[/tex]

For any integral [tex]\int A*f(x)dx = A\int f(x)dx[/tex] where A is a constant.

we're just factoring it out... so you don't need an other side...

never mind about taking the constants out...

suppose I had it like this:

[tex]\int\frac{-m}{mg}*\frac{\frac{du}{sqrt[c/mg]}}{1+ u^2}[/tex]

now, I just want to clean this up a little... simplify it... don't take anything outsdie the integral.
 
Last edited:
  • #65
You mean for me to to it?

I know and understand your first rule there, but does that apply to a multi layer division?
 
  • #66
Oblio said:
You mean for me to to it?

Yeah.

I know and understand your first rule there, but does that apply to a multi layer division?

Which rule?
 
  • #67
learningphysics said:
[tex]\int5xdx = 5\int xdx[/tex]

For any integral [tex]\int A*f(x)dx = A\int f(x)dx[/tex] where A is a constant.

QUOTE]
 
  • #68
Oblio said:
learningphysics said:
[tex]\int5xdx = 5\int xdx[/tex]

For any integral [tex]\int A*f(x)dx = A\int f(x)dx[/tex] where A is a constant.

QUOTE]

don't worry about taking anything out of the integral... just simplify it inside the integral.
 
  • #69
Yeah, that's what I'm aiming for, but when I simplify equations; mentally I do the 'what you do to one side, do to the other' etc. With nothing outside of the integral, how do we bring out sqrt[c/mg] ?
 
  • #70
Oblio said:
Yeah, that's what I'm aiming for, but when I simplify equations; mentally I do the 'what you do to one side, do to the other' etc. With nothing outside of the integral, how do we bring out sqrt[c/mg] ?

don't bring it out:

[tex]\int\frac{-m}{mg}*\frac{\frac{du}{sqrt[c/mg]}}{1+ u^2}[/tex]

this equals

[tex]\int\frac{-m}{mg}*\frac{1}{sqrt[c/mg]}*\frac{du}{1+ u^2}[/tex]

now, the first thing you can do is cancel the m's in the numerator and denominator... what else can you do to simplify...
 

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
797
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top