Equation of Motion for a Projectile Under Quadratic Air Resistance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oblio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of motion for a projectile under the influence of gravity and quadratic air resistance. Participants clarify that both forces oppose the projectile's motion, leading to the equations ma = -mg - cv² for upward motion and ma = -mg + cv² for downward motion. The conversation emphasizes the need to solve a differential equation and integrate to find velocity as a function of time, with arctan emerging as a relevant function during integration. There is a consensus on the necessity of variable substitution to simplify the integral, and participants share insights on integration techniques. Overall, the thread illustrates the complexities involved in modeling projectile motion with air resistance and the mathematical strategies required to solve it.
  • #101
Oblio said:
Ok, one sec. But vter is when v=0 ?

No. look at post #94 for vter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
Oblio said:
Ok, one sec. But vter is when v=0 ?

v=0 is at the top of the trajectory.
 
  • #103
learningphysics said:
No. look at post #94 for vter.



Ok I thought you were saying that :P
 
  • #104
I got t=c for v=0
 
  • #105
and vter = sqrt[mg/c]
 
  • #106
Oblio said:
I got t=c for v=0

yes. And I've calculated C in post #92.
 
  • #107
I can manipulate the right to get the correct v/vter, but not the left yet. I need g in the denominator, but I also need it for vter...
 
  • #108
Oblio said:
I can manipulate the right to get the correct v/vter, but not the left yet. I need g in the denominator, but I also need it for vter...

vter = sqrt(mg/c)

what is vter/g ?
 
  • #109
sqrt[m/c]

but now with all the stuff C brought in I don't have the equation I'm after anymore
 
  • #110
Oblio said:
sqrt[m/c]

No, vter/g = sqrt(m/cg)

but now with all the stuff C brought in I don't have the equation I'm after anymore

I don't understand... you need to get the time to the top of the trajectory right?

time to the top of the trajectory = C.
 
  • #111
Oblio said:
lol phew I was worried for a sec.

have I already defined the relation that will give me

t(top) = \frac{v(ter)}{g}arctan(\frac{vo}{v(ter)}) ?


Yeah, the question said to solve it to this:

which I have withOUT c.. lol.. I don't get it
 
  • #112
it's the exact same thing though..
whats that mean?
 
  • #113
Oblio said:
it's the exact same thing though..
whats that mean?

t = -\sqrt{\frac{m}{gc}}arctan(\sqrt{\frac{c}{mg}}*v) + \sqrt{\frac{m}{gc}}arctan(\sqrt{\frac{c}{mg}}*v0)

you need t when v = 0,

t_{top} = \sqrt{\frac{m}{gc}}arctan(\sqrt{\frac{c}{mg}}*v0)

And this equals: \frac{vter}{g}arctan(\frac{v0}{vter})
 
  • #114
Your right. I get it!
 
  • #115
when you do

sqrt[mg/c] /g

=sqrt[mg/c] x 1/g
=sqrt[mg/cg]

Now I know this is wrong, but...why?
 
  • #116
Oblio said:
when you do

sqrt[mg/c] /g

=sqrt[mg/c] x 1/g
=sqrt[mg/cg]

Now I know this is wrong, but...why?

when you bring the g under the square root... you need to square it... g = sqrt(g^2)

so your last step would be

=sqrt[mg/(cg^2)]
 
  • #117
*high school flash back*

Right!
 
  • #118
with gravity, wouldn't this give me negative time values?
 
Back
Top