Equations to do with the z distance of a screw helix.

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackWyvern
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helix Screw
BlackWyvern
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have a screw with the distance between the threads being equal to 0.1mm. It takes a torque of 10Nm to turn the screw about 2pi radians. What would the torque be to turn a screw with the z distance equal to 0.2mm. Explain your reasoning.


Homework Equations


Not sure.


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to do this at all. I guess we can assume that the resistive force we have to overcome is proportional to the length of metal we are driving into the material. So by that logic, and a simplification:

If we took the z index as the height of a rectangle, and the circumference of the screw as the width, the diagonal distance would be the distance of metal that goes through the wood. So we just find the ratio of the second diagonal, to the first, and multiply the Torque by this? Or is there something I'm missing, this seems too easy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the distance between the threads is measured as a z distance then one would expect that for each full turn the screw would move a distance of 0.1mm. However I am a bit perplexed by the question since that is not made clearand also does it mean the screw descends 0.2mm or the threads increase in separation to 0.2mm?
 
The screw would move down 0.1mm. But, the thread on the screw would move though more than that. This question is about ratios, and then applying them. But I just don't know much about screws and the forces on them. I know that they are a lever, but that's about it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top