Equivalent Resistance Homework: Help Needed!

  • Thread starter Thread starter yecko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the equivalent resistance in a circuit involving resistors in series and parallel configurations. A key point is the identification of a 12 kΩ resistor that can be removed due to having no voltage across it, simplifying the circuit to achieve the correct equivalent resistance of 6 kΩ. Participants suggest various methods for solving the circuit, including nodal analysis and voltage source application, while also discussing the relevance of delta-star transformations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding circuit symmetry and potential dividers in solving for equivalent resistance. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes problem-solving strategies in electrical circuits.
yecko
Gold Member
Messages
275
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


螢幕快照 2017-12-13 上午11.32.52.png


Homework Equations


parallel(two shared nodes in two sides), series resistor(one shared node between 2 resistors)

The Attempt at a Solution


2017-12-13-PHOTO-00000175.jpg

I can't identify the circuit to be parallel or series in order to get the equivalent resistance.
how should I finish the question?

( correction: answer=6kΩ)
as i will have exam few hours later... please help! thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 螢幕快照 2017-12-13 上午11.32.52.png
    螢幕快照 2017-12-13 上午11.32.52.png
    17.1 KB · Views: 1,054
  • 2017-12-13-PHOTO-00000175.jpg
    2017-12-13-PHOTO-00000175.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 972
Physics news on Phys.org
It's against my religion to offer full solution but I can give you a hint:
If you look how the 12 ##k\Omega## is connected, you notice that there is no voltage across it, so, no current. Just remove it from the circuit and continue.
 
Henryk said:
If you look how the 12 kΩkΩk\Omega is connected, you notice that there is no voltage across it,
you should be right, when I shorted the 12 kΩ, i can get the correct answer of 6kΩ
but why no voltage across it?
 
螢幕快照 2017-12-13 下午12.39.19.png

what if this kind of asymmetric circuit?
 

Attachments

  • 螢幕快照 2017-12-13 下午12.39.19.png
    螢幕快照 2017-12-13 下午12.39.19.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 571
Convert the upper triangle from delta to star.
 
jaus tail said:
Convert the upper triangle from delta to star.
what do you mean by "delta" and "star"?
(i have never learned wheatstone bridge...)
 
Have you been taught star-delta resistance transformation?
Or only Rseries and Rparallel?
 
Only R series and parallel...
 
yecko said:
Only R series and parallel...
If you are unfamiliar with the Δ-Y transformations (It would be worth your while to look it up!), then an alternative is to apply a voltage source across AB and solve the circuit for the current that the source produces. Ohm's law will then tell you the effective load resistance.
 
  • #10
gneill said:
If you are unfamiliar with the Δ-Y transformations (It would be worth your while to look it up!), then an alternative is to apply a voltage source across AB and solve the circuit for the current that the source produces. Ohm's law will then tell you the effective load resistance.

Even if a voltage source is applied, wouldn't star-delta transformation be needed. I don't think there is any other way to find the currents.
Nodal analysis?
 
  • #11
upload_2017-12-15_7-45-5.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-15_7-45-5.png
    upload_2017-12-15_7-45-5.png
    12.3 KB · Views: 647
  • #12
the four 9 ohm resistors (two in each series) can be replaced judiciously by two six ohm resistors and two 12 ohm resistors in series with two six ohm resistors. Then you have a symmetric circuit around the middle 12 ohm resistor. Because of symmetry, there is no reason to expect a different potential at either end of the middle 12 ohm resistor. Clever problem eh.?
 
  • #13
Babadag, there's no need to derive a mesh solution. Simple reduction by various parallel and series combinations gives 6 ohms.
 
  • #14
You are right. My mistake. The result is 6 indeed.:frown:
 
  • #15
I actually said 'remove it'.
yecko said:
but why no voltage across it?
If you look at the circuit, the left side of the 12 ##k\Omega## resistor is connected to the right sides of both 3 ##k\Omega## via the same resistances, hence it's voltage is an average of the corresponding nodes voltages. The same is true for the right side of that resistor.
And the final proof: you shorted it and got the correct answer. Now remove it and redo the calculations, you'll get exactly the same answer.

yecko said:
what do you mean by "delta" and "star"?
(i have never learned wheatstone bridge...)
Do you know the loop current method? you can use that too.
 
  • #16
jaus tail said:
Even if a voltage source is applied, wouldn't star-delta transformation be needed. I don't think there is any other way to find the currents.
Nodal analysis?
No, you can avoid star-delta if you apply mesh or nodal analysis, or even "raw" KVL and KCL equations with branch currents.
 
  • Like
Likes jaus tail
  • #17
mpresic2 said:
the four 9 ohm resistors (two in each series) can be replaced judiciously by two six ohm resistors and two 12 ohm resistors in series with two six ohm resistors. Then you have a symmetric circuit around the middle 12 ohm resistor. Because of symmetry, there is no reason to expect a different potential at either end of the middle 12 ohm resistor. Clever problem eh.?
I'm struggling to understand this. Can you please post a picture of the configuration?
 
  • #18
jaus tail said:
I'm struggling to understand this. Can you please post a picture of the configuration?
The 9kΩ resistors are arranged as a potential divider, setting their midpoint at (in this case) 50% of the potential across them all. The pair of 6kΩ resistors likewise form a similar potential divider ...
 
  • Like
Likes jaus tail

Similar threads

Back
Top