Equivalent Resistance of an RLC circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equivalent resistance of an RLC circuit for a homework problem. Initially, the user attempted to find the equivalent resistance but arrived at a value of 7.5 ohms, which contradicts the book's answer of 2 ohms. After reevaluating the circuit by opening the switch and removing the sources, the user identified that only the rightmost loop remains, consisting of a 2-ohm resistor, a 2H inductor, and a 1F capacitor. The user seeks confirmation on whether this revised approach is correct. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately interpreting circuit configurations in RLC analysis.
wiz0r
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


It is in the attachment.

NOTE: I supposed I did a little mistake when I drew the circuit with PSpice. The closed switch should look like .---->. instead of having that 45 angle. I don't know if it matters or not, so yea..


Homework Equations



Rp = (R1 * R2)/ (R1 + R2)
Rs = R1 + R2 + R3 + ... + Rn
α(series) = Req / (2*L)
Wo = 1/sqrt(LC)

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, well, I'm trying to solve this second order transient circuit, but I have a problem! I can't find the correct equivalent resistance. What I do first is to remove the voltage source by a short and the current source by an open circuit. Now, I got to find the equivalent resistance to calculate α. What I do is;

R12 = (2 * 6) / (2 + 6) = 1.5 ohms

then;

Req = R12 + R3 + R4 = 1.5 + 4 + 2 = 7.5 ohms

According to the book, the Req should be 2 ohms! So either, I'm doing something really wrong, or there's a mistake with the book. Can someone please help me?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • circ.JPG
    circ.JPG
    22 KB · Views: 750
Physics news on Phys.org
mm, well, i figured out what was wrong.

since the switch is closed, i need it to open it to find the equivalents R, L, and C to check if its an series RLC or parallel RLC.

i opened the switch, and took out the sources, everything cancels out, and i'll have only the rightmost loop with the 2 ohm resistance, 2H inductance, and 1F capacitance.

anyway, could somone tell me if I am right or not?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top