Estimate the Resistance of a Gold Wedding Ring

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dhooy7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance Ring
AI Thread Summary
To estimate the resistance of a gold wedding ring, one must consider the resistivity of gold and the dimensions of the ring, including its length and cross-sectional area. Assumptions include that the ring is either pure gold or a mixture with copper, affecting its resistivity. The cross-sectional area can be calculated using the formula A = πr², where r is the radius, and the length can be approximated based on the ring's circumference. A reasonable assumption for the radius is 1.5mm, with a diameter ranging from 15mm to 20mm. The resistance can then be calculated using the formula R = ρL/A, acknowledging that precise measurements may be difficult due to circuit setup challenges.
Dhooy7
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Estimate the resistance of a gold (wedding-type) ring. State clearly all assumptions, and introduce any equations you use. your solution should also include a brief summary of how you approached and solved the problem. Helpful tip:

You will have to make certain assumptions. My professor is not looking for one particular numerical answer. Any reasonable approximations will be acceptable.

Homework Equations



I have the Resistance equation.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSxbMjcZxKYxA-7OganCoOweUie1EfwUoqpIvj5jAZ0lBWBXSN9vv8VKGQ.png

upload_2015-3-24_9-41-10.jpeg

The Attempt at a Solution



We have to make assumptions. I would need to lookup the resistivity of gold.

Not sure though how to do it though if it is 50% copper as well. If it was 100% gold, you would lookup the resistivity of gold, the length of gold ring (L), and figure out the area.

I would make an assumption for the radius. This would be a cross-sectional area I believe. I'm not really sure what some reasonable L, and R values are.

Also, what would you say about being 100% gold vs 50% copper and 50% gold?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is nothing wrong with assuming that the ring is pure gold.
The radius of cross section is important.

if r is the radius of cross section, then ##\pi r^2## is A.
Then you can find L when radius of ring is R.
You can then find R using the expression ##R=\rho L/A##

So if you find R using the above method,the assumptions you would be making are:
1)the cross section of ring is circular
2)the ring is pure gold
 
What are some reasonable assumptions and values for a cross-sectional radius of a ring?

Is 0.1cm for r and what is the L for?
 
The problem is, it is difficult to measure its resistance using circuits. For example, if you use a battery of 3V and an ammeter, then you have to connect the ring like this -()-. Now the equvivalent resistance depends on the arc length between the connecting wires. Once you know the equvivalent resistance in terms of R, use ammeter and baterry to find equivalent resistance from circuit and then equate the two. The value of R will not be precise.
 
Here is a better assumption. After going through the dimensions of some wedding rings, I found that they almost have a semi circular cross section. 1.5mm radius is good.
so take radius of cross section as 1.5mm and assume semicircular cross section. The diameter can be taken from 15mm to 20mm.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top