Estimating Milky Way Absolute Magnitude

tristan3214
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Important: All Logs are base 10 and not the natural log.

Homework Statement


This question is from Foundations of Astrophysics from chapter 19

Suppose the Milky Way consisted of 2.7x10^11 stars, each of solar luminosity MB=4.7. What would be the absolute magnitude of the whole galaxy?

To clarify that is absolute magnitude in the B band rather than the V band.

Homework Equations


Some equations I have been using:
M=m-5Log(d)+5 Distance Modulus
m2-m1=2.5Log(Flux1/Flux2) for finding flux
F=L/(4∏d^2) for finding luminosity
n=number density=#of stars/volume of cylinder for the galaxy.
average distance=1/n1/3, this is for a sphere though so it is very hand wavy
Mbol=Mbol,sun-2.5Log[L/Lsun]

The Attempt at a Solution


So when I first saw this problem I wanted to go from absolute magnitude of one star and find the luminosity. With that I would find the total luminosity of the galaxy by multiplying by the number of stars then find absolute magnitude of the galaxy from there.

The ideal way would be to use bolometric magnitudes to get luminosity comparatively to the sun. However, my biggest problem here is that I have absolute magnitude of the stars in B band making things harder. As well as with going a bolometric route there is a lot of looking up of values that aren't easy to find.

I tried finding apparent magnitude of the star by using the average distance between the stars but when I try to find the flux of one of the stars to find the luminosity I don't have the flux of the sun in the B band.

Overall I come here because I feel like maybe there is an easier way than having to search around for things like the luminosity or flux of the sun in the B band.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They tell you "solar luminosity" in the problem, implying L=3.84e26W. I take the fact that they give you the absolute magnitude in the B-band as unnecessary information. But it's a reinforcement that they're truly talking of "sun-like" stars. Then you can just find bolometric magnitude.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top