Estimating Resistivity of Amorphous Metal - Condensed Matter

12x4
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Estimate the resistivity of an amorphous metal whose mean free path is of the order of an atomic spacing. Compare your answer to crystalline copper.

Homework Equations


VF = h(bar) KF / m
VF = l / τ
ρ = m / n e2 τ

The Attempt at a Solution



I think my real issue with this question is I'm not sure what are reasonable numbers to estimate with.

We need to find τ to plug into ρ = m / n e2 τ

Using VF = l / τ we can rearrange to get τ = l / VFfor l:

We are told the mean free path, l, is of the order of an atomic spacing but I am not sure what is a reasonable estimation of this is?

for VF:

VF = h(bar) KF / m

KF3 = 3π2n where n = NAρ/atomic weight

Again I am not sure what to use as my values for ρ and atomic weight. It seems as though I am missing something about amorphous metals. I understand that they have disordered structures but how can i make an estimation for KF with that little information.

Thanks in advance to anyone that replies and apologies if this is a bit of a basic question.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
12x4 said:
We are told the mean free path, l, is of the order of an atomic spacing but I am not sure what is a reasonable estimation of this is?
A factor of 2 does not matter here, so you can look up the size of atoms of your favorite metal and use this. Same for density and atomic weight.

In general, the rough size of atoms (order of magnitude) is something you should know.
 
mfb said:
A factor of 2 does not matter here, so you can look up the size of atoms of your favorite metal and use this. Same for density and atomic weight.

In general, the rough size of atoms (order of magnitude) is something you should know.

Thank you for your reply. I think I am still getting a bit confused as, as I understand it amorphous metals are glasses and therefore, depending on their density, can have a much larger atomic spacing?

Regardless i'll complete the question with a spacing of a few angstroms. Thank you
 
12x4 said:
as I understand it amorphous metals are glasses and therefore, depending on their density, can have a much larger atomic spacing?
As I said, a factor of 2 does not matter here. A few angstrom is fine.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top