What Determines the Range of Bound States in a Spherical Finite Well?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the conditions for bound states in a spherical finite well defined by the potential V. The key equation relates k2 and k1 through cotangent, and the parameters α and R are crucial for determining the existence of bound states. It is noted that when R equals π/2, there are no bound states, as the only solutions yield k2=0. The restriction of energies between -V0 and 0 is justified by the requirement for bound states to exist within this energy range. The inquiry seeks clarity on how the precise range of bound states is established based on these parameters.
Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was reviewing some homework problems and looking at the solutions. There is one problem with a tiny step I just cannot rationalize and I am hoping someone can point me in the right direction.

I have a spherical finite well:

V = {- V_{0}: 0 < r < a},

= {0: r \geq a}

- k_{2} = k_{1} cot (k_{1} a) (1)

Refining the notation,

\alpha = a \sqrt{(2m(E + V_{0})}/hbar = k_{1} a

R = a \sqrt{(2m(V_{0})}/hbar and k_{2} = \sqrt{(2m(V_{0})}/hbar

So (1) may be rewritten as \sqrt{R^{2} - \alpha^{2}} = - \alpha cot (\alpha)

Homework Equations



From part 1.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand how at R = \pi/2 there are no bound states.

Also, I am given this restriction: -V_{0} < E < 0

How is this justified and how is the precise range of bound states determined?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When R=\pi/2, the only solutions are at \alpha=\pm\pi/2. In these cases, you get k2=0.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top