News FYI, here's the study I was talking about

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chemicalsuperfreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Study
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a significant study by Bertrand and Mullainathan that highlights racial discrimination in hiring practices. Their research indicates that applicants with white-sounding names receive 50 percent more callbacks than those with African-American names, equating to the advantage of having eight additional years of experience. The study reveals that while better resumes yield more callbacks for white applicants, the impact is minimal for African-American applicants, suggesting that discrimination hampers their job prospects and employability. The findings imply that training programs alone may not suffice to overcome these barriers, as African-Americans might hesitate to participate due to perceived biases in how their skills are valued. Additionally, the study notes that discrimination is consistent across various industries and does not lessen among federal contractors or larger employers. Interestingly, employers in predominantly African-American neighborhoods show slightly less discrimination. The discussion also touches on the desire to compare this research with another study examining name-based discrimination unrelated to race, potentially involving gender differences.
Chemicalsuperfreak
Messages
218
Reaction score
2
Physics news on Phys.org
"The 50 percent gap in callback rates is statistically very significant, Bertrand and Mullainathan note in Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination (NBER Working Paper No. 9873). It indicates that a white name yields as many more callbacks as an additional eight years of experience. Race, the authors add, also affects the reward to having a better resume. Whites with higher quality resumes received 30 percent more callbacks than whites with lower quality resumes. But the positive impact of a better resume for those with Africa-American names was much smaller.
"While one may have expected that improved credentials may alleviate employers' fear that African-American applicants are deficient in some unobservable skills, this is not the case in our data," the authors write. "Discrimination therefore appears to bite twice, making it harder not only for African-Americans to find a job but also to improve their employability."
From a policy standpoint, this aspect of the findings suggests that training programs alone may not be enough to alleviate the barriers raised by discrimination, the authors write. "If African-Americans recognize how employers reward their skills, they may be rationally more reluctant than whites to even participate in these programs."
The experiment, conducted between July 2001 and January 2002, reveals several other aspects of discrimination. If the fictitious resume indicates that the applicant lives in a wealthier, or more educated, or more-white neighborhood, the callback rate rises. Interestingly, this effect does not differ by race. Indeed, if ghettos and bad neighborhoods are particularly stigmatizing for African-Americans, one might have expected them to be helped more than whites by having a "good" address.
Further, discrimination levels are statistically uniform across all the occupation and industry categories covered in the experiment. Federal contractors, sometimes regarded as more severely constrained by affirmative action laws, do not discriminate less. Neither do larger employers, or employers who explicitly state that they are "Equal Opportunity Employer" in their ads.
Another finding is that employers located in more African-American neighborhoods in Chicago are slightly less likely to discriminate. There is also little evidence that social background of applicants – suggested by the names used on resumes – drives the extent of discrimination.
 
I'd like to compare this study to the study done several years ago that showed another comparision of names, not race related but with similar results.
Are you familiar with the study I'm referring to?
 
Originally posted by kat
I'd like to compare this study to the study done several years ago that showed another comparision of names, not race related but with similar results.
Are you familiar with the study I'm referring to?
Is it one with male and female names, kat?
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...

Similar threads

Back
Top