Excitation of a hydrogen atom by electron collisions

petermacfarlane
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
The problem:
A beam of electrons with kinetic energy 12.8 eV collides with a hydrogen target. What visible spectral lines will be emitted due to collisions?

My question:
I am confident I know how to do the bulk of this question, I am just uncertain about one thing: I know that 12.8 eV is enough energy to excite a ground state electron to n=4. But can a collision from an electron with KE = 12.8 eV excite hydrogen to n=3 or n=2 as well, or must it be the highest energy state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is clearly yes, it can also excite it to n=3 or n=2 as well as n=4. The spectral lines you see will be the transitions of n=4 to n= 3, n= 4 to n= 2, and n=4 to n= 1, along with n=3 to n= 2, n= 3 to n= 1, and n= 2 to n= 1.
 
  • Like
Likes petermacfarlane
Charles Link said:
The answer is clearly yes, it can also excite it to n=3 or n=2 as well as n=4. The spectral lines you see will be the transitions of n=4 to n= 3, n= 4 to n= 2, and n=4 to n= 1, along with n=3 to n= 2, n= 3 to n= 1, and n= 2 to n= 1.
In addition, it asked what "visible" lines. It appears it wants you to check the wavelengths of each of these transitions to see which ones are between 3800 and 7500 Angstroms or thereabouts...
 
Charles Link said:
In addition, it asked what "visible" lines. It appears it wants you to check the wavelengths of each of these transitions to see which ones are between 3800 and 7500 Angstroms or thereabouts...

Thank you for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top