Existence of Laplace Transform of Piecewise Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a piecewise function defined as f(t) = t for 03. Participants are exploring whether this function is piecewise continuous, whether it is of exponential order α, and the existence of its Laplace transform.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the piecewise continuity of the function, discussing the limits of the two pieces as t approaches 3. Others are uncertain about the implications of continuity on the existence of the Laplace transform and whether the function meets the criteria for being of exponential order α.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining the definition of piecewise continuity and its implications. There is a divergence in understanding, particularly regarding the continuity at the transition point, which is prompting further inquiry into the definitions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are referencing definitions from their texts, indicating that the understanding of piecewise continuity may vary based on different interpretations or sources. There is also a mention of needing to establish constants M, T, and α for the exponential order condition, which has not yet been addressed.

taxidriverhk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f(t) = t if 0<t<3
et if t>3

a. Is f(t) piece-wise continuous?
b. Is f(t) of exponential order α? Either prove it by producing an M, T and α that satisfies the definition, or show that no such constants exist.
c. Does the Laplace transform of f(t) exist? Briefly explain your answer.

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I know it is not piecewise continuous already.
But can this point prove that the Laplace transform of this function does not exist?
Or do I still have to prove if it is of exponential order α? But I don't know how to find the M, α and T

Hope anyone can help me, thank you so much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
taxidriverhk said:

Homework Statement


Let f(t) = t if 0<t<3
et if t>3

a. Is f(t) piece-wise continuous?
b. Is f(t) of exponential order α? Either prove it by producing an M, T and α that satisfies the definition, or show that no such constants exist.
c. Does the Laplace transform of f(t) exist? Briefly explain your answer.

I know it is not piecewise continuous already.

You do?
 
LCKurtz said:
You do?

Sure, the limits of et and t as t approaches 3 are not equal, so f(t) should not be piece-wise continuous, isn't that right?
 
taxidriverhk said:
Sure, the limits of et and t as t approaches 3 are not equal, so f(t) should not be piece-wise continuous, isn't that right?

No, that isn't right. That would make the functions continuous. What is the definition of piecewise continuous given in your text?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K