Expectation value of kinetic energy (QM)

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


In a QM problem I must calculate the expectation value of the kinetic energy, namely ##\langle \Psi _c ,\frac{ \hat { \vec p } ^2}{2m} \Psi _c \rangle##. Where ##\Psi _c=ce^{-\alpha x^2}##.

Homework Equations



##\int _{-\infty}^\infty \exp \{ -a x^2 +bx \} dx = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}\exp \{ -\frac{b^2}{4a} \}##.

The Attempt at a Solution


##\langle \Psi _c ,\frac{ \hat { \vec p } ^2}{2m} \Psi _c \rangle = \int _{-\infty}^\infty c e^{-\alpha x^2} \frac{\hbar ^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2}(ce^{-\alpha x^2})dx####=...=-\frac{\hbar ^2}{m}\alpha c^2 \underbrace{\int _{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2\alpha x^2}dx}_{=I}+\frac{2\hbar ^2}{m} \alpha c^2 \underbrace{\int _{\infty}^\infty x^2 e^{-2\alpha x^2}dx}_{=J}##.
After some algebra, I reached that ##I=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2\alpha}}## while ##J=\frac{\sqrt \pi}{2^{5/2}\alpha ^{3/2}}##.
From which I reached that ##\langle \Psi _c ,\frac{ \hat { \vec p } ^2}{2m} \Psi _c \rangle = \frac{\hbar ^2 c^2 \pi ^{1/2}}{2^{3/2}m} \left ( \frac{1}{\alpha ^{1/2}} -\alpha ^{1/2} \right )##.
But I'm having a hard time to swallow the fact that this number is negative if alpha is greater than 1. What do you think? I made some mistake somewhere?! Right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fluidistic said:
##\frac{\hbar ^2 c^2 \pi ^{1/2}}{2^{3/2}m} \left ( \frac{1}{\alpha ^{1/2}} -\alpha ^{1/2} \right )##.

Note that the two terms inside the parentheses are inconsistent with dimensions. Check to make sure you got the correct number of factors of ##\alpha## in front of the J integral.

EDIT: Also, don't forget that the momentum operator has a factor of ##i##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TSny said:
Note that the two terms inside the parentheses are inconsistent with dimensions. Check to make sure you got the correct number of factors of ##\alpha## in front of the J integral.

EDIT: Also, don't forget that the momentum operator has a factor of ##i##.

I see. I've just checked out my 2 integrals with Wolfram Alpha and I didn't make any mistake there. So indeed, it should be in the factor(s) outside the integral(s).

##\hat {\vec p}^2=-\hbar ^2 \frac{d^2}{dx^2}##. So already I'm off a sign. I forgot the minus sign in my calculations. I'll recheck the rest and post tomorrow (too late here).
Thank you very much so far.
 
I've redone the whole algebra but the 2 integrals and I reached that the factor in front of I is ##2c^2\hbar ^2 \alpha## and the one in front of J is ##-4c^2 \hbar ^2 \alpha ^2## which makes the result for the expectation value of the momentum: ##c^2\hbar ^2 \sqrt {\frac{\pi \alpha }{2}}## which is always positive. However I'm not sure the units make sense.
If I'm not wrong, the units of c^2 is density of probability, i.e. 1/m (1 over meter). The units of alpha are 1/m^2 because the exponent must be adimensional. And the units of hbar squared are (J*s)^2, joule per second squared. So I get that the units of expectation of the momentum are J^2s^2/m^2 instead of J.Nevermind I forgot to divide all my algebra by 2m (2 masses). By doing so I get a result for the expectation value of ##\frac{c^2\hbar^2 \sqrt{\pi \alpha }}{2^{3/2}m}##. The units are joule, a unit of energy which is a good sign.
 
I think that's the right answer.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top