Expectation Value of Momentum for Wavepacket

torq123
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the average momentum for a packet corresponding to this normalizable wavefunction?

\Psi(x) = C \phi(x) exp(ikx)

C is a normalization constant and \phi(x) is a real function.

Homework Equations


\hat{p}\rightarrow -i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}

The Attempt at a Solution



\int\Psi(x)^{*}\Psi(x)dx = \int C^2 \phi(x)^{2}dx= 1

Plugging in the momentum operator and using the chain rule:

<\hat{p}> = \hbar k \int C^2 \phi(x)^2 dx - i \hbar \int C^2 \phi^{'}\phi dx

The second term is always imaginary since \phi(x) is real, so I said the momentum is \hbar k which I think might be right, but for the wrong reasons? I didn't think Hermetian operators could give imaginary expectation values...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
torq123 said:
<\hat{p}> = \hbar k \int C^2 \phi(x)^2 dx - i \hbar \int C^2 \phi^{'}\phi dx

The second term is always imaginary since \phi(x) is real, so I said the momentum is \hbar k which I think might be right, but for the wrong reasons? I didn't think Hermetian operators could give imaginary expectation values...
Try working on the 2nd term a bit more. Hint: use integration by parts.
 
Are you saying that the second term must be zero since \phi vanishes at ±∞ and the integral evaluates to \phi^2(x)/2? That makes sense to me.
 
torq123 said:
Are you saying that the second term must be zero since \phi vanishes at ±∞ and the integral evaluates to \phi^2(x)/2?
That's the idea.
 
Awesome. Thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top