Expectation Value of Q in orthonormal basis set Psi

Decadohedron
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that { |ψ1>, |ψ2>,...,|ψn>} is an orthonormal basis set and all of the basis vectors are eigenvectors of the operator Q with Q|ψj> = qjj> for all j = 1...n.

A particle is in the state |Φ>.

Show that for this particle the expectation value of <Q> is

j=1nqj |<Φ| ψj> |^2

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



1. |Φ> = ∑an| ψn> with an = <Ψn|Φ>

2. Q|ψj> = qjΣbnn>, with b_n = <Ψn| Ψj>

After introducing the delta
a_m = QΣb_nΨ_n

Then, I should have

<Q> = Σ | Q |^2

= Σ | Q|Ψ> | ^2
= Σ q_j |Σ b_n | Ψ_n|^2
= Σ q_j |a_m|^2
= Σ q_j | <Ψ_m|Φ> |^2

Then by taking the inner product

= Σ q_j | < Φ|Ψ> | ^2

That's about as close as I could get but I have this general feeling of being very wrong. Not sure how else to approach this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nowhere in your attempt at a solution is there the starting point for the expectation value of the operator, namely ##<\Phi|Q|\Phi>.## Start from that and then use what you already know, namely ##|\Phi>=\sum <\psi_n|\Phi>|\psi_n>## and ##Q|\psi_n> = q_n|\psi_n>.## Note that both the bra ##<\Phi|## and the ket ##|\Phi>## in the expectation value bra-ket are summations.
 
  • Like
Likes Decadohedron
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top