Expectation Values of Angular Momentum Operators

KiwiBlack
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that

< l,m | Lx2 - Ly2 | l,m > = 0

Homework Equations



L2 = Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2

[ Lx, Ly ] = i [STRIKE]h[/STRIKE] Lz

[ L, Lz ] = i [STRIKE]h[/STRIKE] Lx

[ Lz, Lx ] = i [STRIKE]h[/STRIKE] Ly



The Attempt at a Solution



I tried substituting different commutation values in place of Lx and Ly, but I'm not reducing it any further. I also tried ladder operations, but my professor said they're not needed to solve the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I think ladder operators are fine, but there are some "shortcut" ways too:

You could probably get away with just saying that it's "obvious" that
\langle l,m \lvert L_x^2 \lvert l,m \rangle = \langle l,m \lvert L_y^2 \lvert l,m \rangle
because an Lz eigenstate shouldn't know the difference between the x and y directions. If you wanted to make that idea precise, you could find out what happens to the eigenstate and to the angular momentum operators when you do a 90-degree rotation about the z-axis.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top