I How Can Fermi Pressure Be Explained in Relativistic Conditions?

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am reading a derivation for Fermi pressure and the author assumes that the electrons in a box are cooled so much that they occupy all the states in the momentum space from p=0 up to a maximum value of p. Then after he obtains a formula for the pressure, he simplifies the formula further, by assuming a very relativistic gas. I am not sure I understand how can we make both assumptions. If we reduce it as much as we can (basically close to 0K), it means that the velocities are very small (the temperature is given by the speed of the particles, so small temperature means small speed). So if the velocities are small, how can one assume "very relativistic" conditions? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At low temperature, all of the low energy states are filled. The only states available for interaction are the high energy states, which have an energy near the Fermi energy. This can lead to the particles being relativistic, even at low temperature.
 
phyzguy said:
At low temperature, all of the low energy states are filled. The only states available for interaction are the high energy states, which have an energy near the Fermi energy. This can lead to the particles being relativistic, even at low temperature.
So you mean that if you have a big enough number of electrons in the volume, the ones with the highest momentum, will be relativistic, just because all the lower velocity states have been occupied?
 
Silviu said:
So you mean that if you have a big enough number of electrons in the volume, the ones with the highest momentum, will be relativistic, just because all the lower velocity states have been occupied?

Yes, exactly. At least, that is my understanding.
 
Silviu said:
the temperature is given by the speed of the particles

The temperature is given by the average speed of the particles. Not all particles will have the average speed.
 
Is there a non interactive fermi gas?
Pauli principle saves the fermi gas from collapsing even at zero kelvin.There is cobditioned degeneracy pressure.
So separatedness of energy levels is only upto the conditoon that star is not big enough to overcome degeneracy pressure .Energy levels of nuclei are enormously big in comparison to atomic energy levels.
Does Pauli principle similarly maintains pressure in electron gas or fermion gas? How?
Please correct if my understanding is inadequate.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top