Exploring the Sun: Amateur Solar Imaging Techniques

In summary, Dave has been posting photos of the sun taken with his camera. There are two large spot groups visible across the disk and new spots are appearing east of the long string of spots. The activity is continuing to grow in complexity and size.
  • #106
@davenn terrific detail. You are getting your money's worth.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #107
sophiecentaur said:
@davenn terrific detail. You are getting your money's worth.

cheers mate :smile:

and I have just spent another AU$1400 today on a better camera
all the guys on various astro forums are telling me I should be using a monochrome camera for getting much better resolution
so I have purchased the ZWO ASI1600MM
https://www.bintel.com.au/product/zwo-asi1600mm-monochrome/

will be interesting to see the results

Dave
 
  • #108
Hi guys

well the ZWO ASI 1600MM finally arrived ( after the postal system sat on it for 3 days
default_frown.gif
)
I did some comparisons between it and my ZWO ASI 178MC that had been the main solar cam up till today
The ASI 1600 is a 16MPix Monochrome camera

these first two are unprocessed ( SOOC ) , just resized for the forum
and ALL images are single frame only ( no stacking)

firstly ... the ASI 178MC using mono mode in SharpCap

5a6302afdacd6_Capture_0001ASI178.thumb.jpg.d74657519dd0c5dad3fb9c39667e8ae6.jpg
Now the ASI 1600MM

Capture_0083 ASI1600.jpg
NOTE:, tho the image from the 178MC looks more detailed. Strong brightness variation can be seen across the image compared to the 1600MM
What I discovered in processing was that the 1600MM image processed so much better and resulted in a significant increase in finer details
default_smile.gif


ASI178 processed ...

180120 ASI178 Cap001.jpg


ASI1600 processed ...

180120 ASI1600 Cap001sm.jpg


There isn't really any comparison between the two ... the ASI1600 shows much better detail. Specially seen around the Active Region

Next post ... prominences

Dave
 

Attachments

  • Capture_0083 ASI1600.jpg
    Capture_0083 ASI1600.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 492
  • 180120 ASI178 Cap001.jpg
    180120 ASI178 Cap001.jpg
    31 KB · Views: 403
  • 180120 ASI1600 Cap001sm.jpg
    180120 ASI1600 Cap001sm.jpg
    51 KB · Views: 467
  • default_frown.gif
    default_frown.gif
    1 KB · Views: 444
  • default_smile.gif
    default_smile.gif
    1 KB · Views: 450
  • 5a6302afdacd6_Capture_0001ASI178.thumb.jpg.d74657519dd0c5dad3fb9c39667e8ae6.jpg
    5a6302afdacd6_Capture_0001ASI178.thumb.jpg.d74657519dd0c5dad3fb9c39667e8ae6.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 406
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, QuantumQuest and Stavros Kiri
  • #109
now some limb/prominences
Ohhh golly gosh !
again, these first two are unprocessed ( SOOC ) , just resized for the forum

ASI178MC

Capture_0004 ASI178.jpg
ASI 1600MM

Capture_0008 ASI1600.jpg
The limb and prominences are just so much sharper for the 1600MM

The 1600MM with a little processing

180120 ASI1600Cap011.jpg


Dave
 

Attachments

  • Capture_0004 ASI178.jpg
    Capture_0004 ASI178.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 444
  • Capture_0008 ASI1600.jpg
    Capture_0008 ASI1600.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 434
  • 180120 ASI1600Cap011.jpg
    180120 ASI1600Cap011.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 397
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, QuantumQuest and Stavros Kiri
  • #110
The ASI 1600MM seems to have a better dynamic range ( well I would expect it to
default_wink.gif
)
it is easier to pull out prominences and still have a non- overexposed surface
please excuse the poor editing blotchiness in the dark area around the outside of the sun ( I don't claim to be the world's best editor
default_wink.gif
)

upload_2018-1-20_21-9-58.png
Dave
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-20_21-9-58.png
    upload_2018-1-20_21-9-58.png
    89.4 KB · Views: 463
  • default_wink.gif
    default_wink.gif
    1 KB · Views: 418
  • default_wink.gif
    default_wink.gif
    1 KB · Views: 422
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000 and QuantumQuest
  • #111
Nice pictures (as usual) Dave. As with the rest of (technical) life, you get what you pay for.
The detail after enhancement makes you want to touch it. It's that lovely illusion (as with the best TV pictures, viewed at the right distance) that you could just go closer and closer with no limit to the image detail.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and Stavros Kiri
  • #112
sophiecentaur said:
Nice pictures (as usual) Dave. As with the rest of (technical) life, you get what you pay for.
The detail after enhancement makes you want to touch it. It's that lovely illusion (as with the best TV pictures, viewed at the right distance) that you could just go closer and closer with no limit to the image detail.
I'm sure it's not just my digital device that ... I magnify, magnify, magnify ... and still get to see a picture of the Sun (huger and huger detail!) ...
Pretty cool!
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #113
sophiecentaur said:
Nice pictures (as usual) Dave. As with the rest of (technical) life, you get what you pay for.
The detail after enhancement makes you want to touch it. It's that lovely illusion (as with the best TV pictures, viewed at the right distance) that you could just go closer and closer with no limit to the image detail.

Thanks buddy :smile:

So true it looks like the AU$1400 for this latest camera was worth the expense :smile:

Stavros Kiri said:
I'm sure it's not just my digital device that ... I magnify, magnify, magnify ... and still get to see a picture of the Sun (huger and huger detail!) ...
Pretty cool!

cheers
buddy

and these pix here have been compressed in physical and kb size by the forum software

here's a link to the larger ( but not full size) rendition that I posted on other forums that don't have the restrictions

https://s10.postimg.org/eamdzbxex/180120_ASI1600_Cap001sm.jpg

the finer detail around that active region ( right area centre right, just to the left of that dark filament ) really starts to stand outDave
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #114
A closer up view of the active region ...

180120 Capture_0002.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 180120 Capture_0002.jpg
    180120 Capture_0002.jpg
    56.1 KB · Views: 413
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000 and Andy Resnick
  • #115
Totes amaze - as they say.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri and davenn
  • #116
The Sun in Ha, 28/01/2018
Finally some clear(ish) skies at a time of the day that I could do some observing and imaging
Some really nice prominences today ...but the surface was pretty much devoid of interesting features

180128 Cap01sm.jpg


180128 Cap13sm.jpg


180128 Cap21sm.jpg


180128 Cap23sm.jpg

Cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180128 Cap01sm.jpg
    180128 Cap01sm.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 403
  • 180128 Cap13sm.jpg
    180128 Cap13sm.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 434
  • 180128 Cap21sm.jpg
    180128 Cap21sm.jpg
    9.2 KB · Views: 464
  • 180128 Cap23sm.jpg
    180128 Cap23sm.jpg
    49.1 KB · Views: 435
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000 and Stavros Kiri
  • #117
Wow! It seems it's like "prominence day" today for the sun! ...
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #118
Stavros Kiri said:
Wow! It seems it's like "prominence day" today for the sun! ...

yes, very much so
a nice collection :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #119
The Sun in Ha -- 4 Feb, 2018

Haven't seen much of the sun for the last week ( since last Sunday's images) Lunt LS60THa, ASI 1600MM camera and SharpCap software.
These are single frame images (no stacking)

A couple of cropped to zoom in on the prominences and a couple of full disk ... varying the exposure allows different features to be more easily seen

180204 Cap010 Ha.jpg


180204 Cap021sm crop Ha.jpg
180204 Cap015sm Ha.jpg

180204 Cap021sm Ha.jpg

cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180204 Cap010 Ha.jpg
    180204 Cap010 Ha.jpg
    13.8 KB · Views: 379
  • 180204 Cap015sm Ha.jpg
    180204 Cap015sm Ha.jpg
    39.6 KB · Views: 458
  • 180204 Cap021sm crop Ha.jpg
    180204 Cap021sm crop Ha.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 392
  • 180204 Cap021sm Ha.jpg
    180204 Cap021sm Ha.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 413
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, Andy Resnick, russ_watters and 1 other person
  • #120
Nice pictures again, Dave. I wonder if it would be worth while tinkering with and stacking multiple exposures to include a bigger range of luminosities. I have a chum who has done this with some regular photographs and increased the contrast range successfully. (Just a thought)
 
  • #121

Attachments

  • aa.jpg
    aa.jpg
    38.8 KB · Views: 431
  • ab.jpg
    ab.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 612
  • ac.jpg
    ac.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 419
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000 and sophiecentaur
  • #122
10 Feb 2018, The Sun in Ha ... The very respectable sunspot group ( largest for at least 4 months) has moved further onto the disk and is displaying some good details. Lunt LS60THa, ASI 1600MM camera and SharpCap software. These are single frame images (no stacking)

180210 Cap_014sm.jpg
the second image is closeup of the active region, the best for some months, the black sunspots can be seen along with the bright areas of flaring between them

180210 Cap_026.jpg
cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180210 Cap_014sm.jpg
    180210 Cap_014sm.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 413
  • 180210 Cap_026.jpg
    180210 Cap_026.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 385
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, Andy Resnick and Stavros Kiri
  • #123
The Sun in Ha, 3 March 2018

Been a couple of weeks since I last got a chance to do some solar observing/imaging some Ha images from today. One very large prominence and some filaments ... Lunt LS60THa and a ASI1600MM camera

180303 Cap001sm.jpg


180303 Cap005sm.jpg


180303 Cap014sm.jpg


180303 Cap027.jpg
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180303 Cap001sm.jpg
    180303 Cap001sm.jpg
    7.8 KB · Views: 424
  • 180303 Cap005sm.jpg
    180303 Cap005sm.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 438
  • 180303 Cap014sm.jpg
    180303 Cap014sm.jpg
    34.9 KB · Views: 417
  • 180303 Cap027.jpg
    180303 Cap027.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 424
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, Drakkith, Andy Resnick and 1 other person
  • #124
Awesome!
Some colour next time? (I like both)
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #125
hi guys and gals

for those interested in solar observations and imaging, I have found a very useful tool for determining the size of
features on the sun eg. sunspots, filaments and prominences etc

I present the Solar Ruler, available here ...
https://samuelastronomy.wordpress.com/tag/solar-ruler/

there is an English version here ...
http://thesolarexplorer.net/index.php/tutorial/article2/article2/the-solar-ruler
the download link is right at the bottom of the page

This is a PDF file that you load into your fav image processing program that is able to support the manipulation of layers when combined

For me, I use Photoshop (PS). I load in my solar image and I load in this PDF file they are in separate tabs at the top of the image viewing area

I resize the solar ruler image to equal the size of my solar image as close as possible, then I copy it and paste it over the top of the solar image.
I then use the move function to move the solar ruler image around so I can align it with the solar image to produce this result

Solar image is the first image from my previous post ...

NOTE: the image is seriously reduced in size and quality to be able to post on this forum

180303 Cap0012asm.jpg
You can see I managed to get the solar and ruler image sizes to match reasonably well

I can now quickly determine the approx. size of that big prominence ... ~ 60,000 - 65,000 km in height above the suns disk !

Quite impressive
hope some finds this useful :smile:

Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180303 Cap0012asm.jpg
    180303 Cap0012asm.jpg
    47.2 KB · Views: 402
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, Andy Resnick and Stavros Kiri
  • #126
davenn said:
for those interested in solar observations and imaging, I have found a very useful tool for determining the size of
features on the sun eg. sunspots, filaments and prominences etc
davenn said:
hope some finds this useful :smile:
Some day I hope (for me) ... . Sounds like great tool!
davenn said:
65,000 km
Ah, a bit less than twice the perimeter of the earth! ... Ok, No big deal! ... :oldlaugh: :oldbiggrin: :-p
 
  • #127
Stavros Kiri said:
Ah, a bit less than twice the perimeter of the earth! ... Ok, No big deal! ... :oldlaugh: :oldbiggrin: :-p

perimeter isn't the important measurement, it is almost 5x the diameter ... that's the important value

remember we are looking at length of prominence say 60,000km round figures
diameter of the Earth 12,700 km round figures. The Earth fits INTO that prominence 4.7x ( 5x if you go out to the 65,000km measurement)

Three Earths side by side will fit through that dark centre part of the loop...

180303 Cap027.jpg
now that is significant :smile:

Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180303 Cap027.jpg
    180303 Cap027.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 449
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #128
davenn said:
now that is significant
I think it's significant anyway! Also it's ~ 1/6 of the distance Earth-Moon ! ...
[The "no big deal" was a joke ...]

(+ light takes about 1/5sec to travel it! ... That means relatively HUGE distance! ...)
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #129
Haven't been able to do any solar imaging for a bit over a month, mainly due to cloudy skies and or lack of activity on the sun
I could have imaged last Saturday 7th April very clear sky and some good prominences.
Only problem was that it was 35C outside and the heat was unbearable to be in for more than a few minutes,
let alone the amount of time to set up the scope and computer and do imaging. That would have taken at least 30mins,
28 - 29 mins more than I was prepared to endure :frown:

How does an astronomer overcome bad condition "blues" ... buy some more gear :smile::biggrin:

So here is my new scope ... A Skywatcher EVOSTAR120 Black Diamond refractor
120mm objective lens and a 1000mm focal length giving a f-stop of 8.3
f-stop (ratio) = FL / aperture = 1000 / 120 = 8.33333...

It's been around 45 years since I last owned a refractor scope (discounting finder scopes)
This scope will get used for visual observing and imaging of solar, planetary, lunar and deep space
The camera in the photos below is the ZWO ASI 1600MM

Visual observing setup ... eyepiece and diagonal...

IMG_1299sm.jpg


visible light imaging...

IMG_1300sm.jpg


Solar Ha imaging through a Daystar Chromospheric filter...

IMG_1301sm.jpg


close-up of the filter and imaging setup...

IMG_1304sm.jpg

cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1299sm.jpg
    IMG_1299sm.jpg
    81.5 KB · Views: 472
  • IMG_1300sm.jpg
    IMG_1300sm.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 437
  • IMG_1301sm.jpg
    IMG_1301sm.jpg
    73.5 KB · Views: 437
  • IMG_1304sm.jpg
    IMG_1304sm.jpg
    25.7 KB · Views: 481
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000, Stavros Kiri and Borg
  • #130
Hi @davenn Nice stuff. Sorry to hear about the weather. It would be nice to have a bit of Sun 'up here' too.
How easy is it to shift that 120mm refractor about? I have a lumpy 8" Newtonian and it's a pain to get it up and onto the mount. No wonder I tend to use my 80mm Equinox nearly all the time. I look around me and 'everyone' seems to be buying or making garden observatories which solve the lifting problem. But the only suitable site for one in my garden is too much in the faces of people using the garden for non astronomical purposes.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #131
sophiecentaur said:
Hi @davenn Nice stuff.

cheers :smile:

sophiecentaur said:
Nice stuff. Sorry to hear about the weather. It would be nice to have a bit of Sun 'up here' too.

lots of sun, but it's been mainly during the week days when I am at work and now that we are getting well into autumn, the days are getting shorter and daylight saving ended easter weekend so the sun is too low in the west for me to observe by the time I get home from work.
Weekends are my only chances for solar observing now.
sophiecentaur said:
How easy is it to shift that 120mm refractor about?

quite light :smile: the tube, mounting rings and that green mounting bar total around 5.5kg

sophiecentaur said:
I have a lumpy 8" Newtonian and it's a pain to get it up and onto the mount. No wonder I tend to use my 80mm Equinox nearly all the time

yeah, I know that feeling with my Celestron 9.25" Schmitt-cass ... It's quite heavy
sophiecentaur said:
But the only suitable site for one in my garden is too much in the faces of people using the garden for non astronomical purposes.

a home observatory is out of the question for me
1... primary reason ... I'm renting the property
2... I'm deep in the red zone of light pollution for doing nite time astronomy :frown:

Back in NZ, I had a 2.5 x 2.5m garden shed obs. that I made the roof roll off
sophiecentaur said:
use my 80mm Equinox

just googled it, nice looking scope:smile: does your one have the 10:1 Crayford fine focuser ?
http://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/review/telescopes/sky-watcher-equinox-80-ed-apocheers
Dave
 
  • #132
davenn said:
2... I'm deep in the red zone of light pollution for doing nite time astronomy
Can't win 'em all. It's not too bad here as there are no street lamps and the only pollution is from some garden lighting next door (she is security mad). My astrophotography efforts are put to shame by some club members who live close into London. The worse the conditions, the more nerdy you have to be. My problem is I have problems with the cold and laziness, limited budget and some other spending priorities. Some of your solar pictures are good justification for your spending, though.
BTW, what sort of solar energy rejection filter can you use with your 120mm? I thought there were limits to objective sizes for 'rear end' filtering. I have a shiny Baader filter for my 80mm objective but that is a poor man's solution to solar, I think.
 
  • #133
davenn said:
How does an astronomer overcome bad condition "blues" ... buy some more gear :smile::biggrin:
Lol ... That always works, doesn't it?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and sophiecentaur
  • #134
davenn said:
So here is my new scope ... A Skywatcher EVOSTAR120 Black Diamond refractor
Nice choice, Skywatcher has been known to put out some good equipment for a reasonable price. I actually just purchased my first refractor a few weeks ago: a Skywatcher esprit 80mm. But of course, I haven't had a clear night since I bought it!:frown:
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #135
  • #136
sophiecentaur said:
Can't win 'em all. It's not too bad here as there are no street lamps and the only pollution is from some garden lighting next door (she is security mad).

grrrr ... been there too in days gone by

sophiecentaur said:
My astrophotography efforts are put to shame by some club members who live close into London. The worse the conditions, the more nerdy you have to be.

yup, that's where you can use some of narrow band filters ... they give weird colours but still give awesome results in heavily light polluted areas
I haven't gone that path as yet. I just travel around an hour out of the city area to get to darker areas.
sophiecentaur said:
Some of your solar pictures are good justification for your spending, though.

cheers :smile:

sophiecentaur said:
BTW, what sort of solar energy rejection filter can you use with your 120mm? I thought there were limits to objective sizes for 'rear end' filtering.

For the Daystar Quark as shown in my photo above, it can handle up to 150mm objective before a ERF is needed
I bought the 120mm scope rather than the 102mm with the thought that I can always stop it down to ~ 100mm. This would still give a 40mm improvement over the Lunt 60mm scope and it would also kick the f-ratio up a bit to improve image sharpness over it's f8.3 @ 120mm

sophiecentaur said:
I have a shiny Baader filter for my 80mm objective but that is a poor man's solution to solar, I think.

The Baader filters are good white light filters and I will still use my one for sunspot imaging ( not that there are many of them lately ... solar minimum)Dave
 
  • #138
  • Like
Likes NFuller
  • #139
The Sun in Ha 13 Apr 2018

Been off work all week with a not nice case of bronchitis, am feeling very unwell :frown:
but did decide to haul the gear out today and do some solar imaging
Reasonably quiet, 4 or 5 small filaments across lower part of disk, 2 groups of prominences on opposite limbs.
The new active region has moved further onto the disk and is showing an associated filament ...
The seeing conditions were better than yesterday
Lunt LS60THa, ZWO ASI1600MM and SharpCap capture software

180413 Ha Cap02sm.jpg


180413 Ha Cap12.jpg


180413 Ha Cap16.jpg


180413 Ha Cap22.jpg


Cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 180413 Ha Cap02sm.jpg
    180413 Ha Cap02sm.jpg
    36.3 KB · Views: 420
  • 180413 Ha Cap12.jpg
    180413 Ha Cap12.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 414
  • 180413 Ha Cap16.jpg
    180413 Ha Cap16.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 377
  • 180413 Ha Cap22.jpg
    180413 Ha Cap22.jpg
    11 KB · Views: 403
  • Like
Likes cbrtea2000
  • #140
davenn said:
I'm assuming, awaiting confirmation from @sophiecentaur , that it is this one ...
Yes. That one looks like mine. It'svery nice. A great (some might say too blingy) finish and focuses well. The rotatable focuser could be better, though. A lot of manual filter changing and suchlike could perhaps make it come loose.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
7
Replies
226
Views
11K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
9
Replies
307
Views
30K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
980
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top