Exponential of an operator into bra-ket notation

Bravus
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question is to evaluate the expression e^-iA, where A is a Hermitian operator whose eigenvalues are known (but not given) using bra-ket algebra.

Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have been looking around, reading the textbook and course notes, checking the web and so on. I have learned that an expression in this form is a 'unitary operator', and what that means.

I'm pretty comfortable with the bra-ket notation, but I'm struggling just to *get into it*. ;-)

If you can help me find a 'way in' to get started, that'd be great: at this point I'm still just kinda staring blankly at it, despite all my efforts so far.

Oh, yeah, I overhead another student mention using a Taylor series. I get how to convert the exponential to a Taylor series, but I'm not so sure how it helps... and the other student might be wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Bravus! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
Bravus said:
The question is to evaluate the expression e^-iA, where A is a Hermitian operator whose eigenvalues are known (but not given) using bra-ket algebra.

I think they mean if A|xn> = λn |xn>,

then what is e-iA|∑anxn> ? :smile:
 
Thanks for the tip on the nicenesses allowed by the forum software - so nice after spending time answering math and physics questions on 'Yahoo Answers' and having to struggle with all-text!

Not sure the answer is giving me a way in, though: maybe I'm just thick. The question definitely just says 'evaluate e-iA'.
 
Hi Bravus! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)

Bravus said:
The question definitely just says 'evaluate e-iA'.

but anyway, what is e-iA|∑anxn> ? :smile:
 
Thanks, and the hint is definitely a handy one. It's Mr Taylor and his Series that really gets the job done in this instance, though...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top