Exponential of hermitian matrix

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the properties of the matrix U = exp[-iA], where A is a Hermitian matrix. It is established that the eigenvectors of A remain eigenvectors of U, with corresponding eigenvalues given by exp[-i*a_i]. The importance of this relationship is highlighted in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of time evolution of wavefunctions. Additionally, the task of proving that U is unitary is emphasized, with hints provided on utilizing the determinant property of unitary matrices. The conversation revolves around applying the Taylor expansion of U to the eigenvalue equations of A to derive these results.
ZCOR
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A be a Hermitian matrix and consider the matrix U = exp[-iA] defined by thr Taylor expansion of the exponential.

a) Show that the eigenvectors of A are eigenvectors of U. If the eigenvalues of A are a subscript(i) for i=1,...N, show that the eigenvalues of U are exp[-i*a subscript(i)].

b) Show that U is unitary.

This example is important in quantum mechanics when A=Ht/h, where H is the Hamiltonian operator, t is time, and h is Plank's constant. Then U evolves the wavefunction over a time t.

Homework Equations


I have uploaded what I have come up with so far, but not sure where to go with it

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
See uploaded file
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3531.JPG
    IMG_3531.JPG
    41 KB · Views: 1,015
Physics news on Phys.org
You have ##A\nu_i = a_i \nu_i## where ##a_i## is the eigenvalue corresponding to an eigenvector ##\nu_i##. Have you tried inputting this eigenvalue equation into the eigenvalue equation for ##U## using its Taylor expansion definition?
ZCOR said:
Show that U is unitary.
Do you know the property of the determinant of a unitary matrix?
 
Ok, will see if I can make that work. Thanks!
 
I'm trying to figure this out, but not sure how to input that equation into the Taylor expansion
 
Try applying ##U## in its Taylor form to an eigenvector of ##A##
$$
(I + iA - \frac{1}{2}A^2 - i\frac{1}{6} A^3 + \ldots) \nu_i .
$$
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top