Exponentiating Matrices: Representation of \exp{(iÔ)}

OhNoYaDidn't
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Consider the operator Ô, choose a convenient base and obtain the representation of
<br /> \ exp{(iÔ)}<br />
<br /> Ô =<br /> \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; \sqrt{3} \\<br /> \sqrt{3} &amp; -1<br /> \end{smallmatrix}\bigr)<br />

Attempt at solution:
So, i read on Cohen-Tannjoudji's Q.M. book that if the matrix is diagonal you can just exponentiate the diagonal elements and that's pretty much it. However, when the matrix is not diagonal, you have to use something like the following:
Lemma: A, P complex matrices, n by n, let's suppose P is invertible, then exp{({P_{}}^{-1}AP)} = {P_{}}^{-1}exp{(A)}P

The proof is not so hard, we basically expand the exponential and note that: {({P_{}}^{-1}AP)}^m = P^{-1} A^mPSo, finding the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of O, we get:
exp{(iÔ)} = <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> -exp{(-2i)}-3exp{(2i)} &amp; 3exp{(-2i)}-3exp{(2i)} \\<br /> exp{(-2i)}-exp{(2i)} &amp; -3exp{(-2i)}-exp{(2i)}<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

Now I'm asked to write |v&gt; = <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1\\ 0<br /> <br /> \end{pmatrix}
on the eigenbase of exp{(iÔ)}

Can you guys help me out? I don't really get what they ask me to do :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compute the eigendecomposition of the matrix. Exponentiate the eigenvalues. Put the matrix back together with the new eigenvalues.

##M = \sum_\lambda \lambda \;|\lambda\rangle \langle \lambda|##

##F(M) = \sum_\lambda F(\lambda) \; |\lambda\rangle \langle \lambda|##

Where the ##\lambda##s in the sum are the eigenvalues/vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes Igael
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top