metrictensor
- 117
- 1
Is it possible to express all natural numbers greater than 2 as the sum of N unique prime numbers? For example, 6 = 2 + 3 and 18 = 13 + 5.
I forgot to mention that 1 and 2 can be used in the sum. I made a mistake. Not 6 = 2 + 3, 5 = 2 + 3. Once you define 1 and 2 you get 3. From 3+1 you get 4 and so on. 5=2+3...matt grime said:6=2+3 does it?
What about the smallest natural greater than 2 that isn't a prime? isn't that a counter example too?
Schnirelman (1939) proved that every even number can be written as the sum of not more than 300 000 primes (Dunham 1990)
What is that supposed to meanIcebreaker said:What if we added up the first 300 002 primes?
robert Ihnot said:Matt grime: the result follows quite easily from Russell's postulate.
Yeah? As re-expressed by Euler, an equivalent form of this conjecture (called the "strong" or "binary" Goldbach conjecture) asserts that all positive even integers can be expressed as the sum of two primes.http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html
So you are saying the Goldbach Conjecture has been proven?
It has been proved there exists a prime for any natural number n > 2 there exists a prime (and I'm really dragging this one from memory) p such that:matt grime said:Well, whatever it should be called, it states given any natural n greater than 2 there is a prime p satisfying n<p<2n, or similar.
Zurtex said:It has been proved there exists a prime for any natural number n > 2 there exists a prime (and I'm really dragging this one from memory) p such that:
n - n^{\frac{23}{42}} < p < n
Which is quite a bit stronger. Although I'm not sure how useful.