Falling Block Pulling Rolling Cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a uniform solid cylinder attached to a string that is wrapped around a frictionless pulley, with a hanging block. The scenario requires determining the acceleration of the block when the system is released from rest, considering the cylinder rolls without slipping.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of torque and forces on both the block and the cylinder, exploring the relationships between tension, static friction, and acceleration.
  • Some participants question the treatment of rolling without slipping and the assumptions made regarding forces acting on the cylinder.
  • There are attempts to simplify notation and clarify the equations used in the calculations.
  • Concerns are raised about potential algebraic mistakes and the consistency of vector directions in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of torque and the need for consistency in the application of forces. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, and participants are encouraged to recheck their work for errors.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem and the potential for confusion due to the interactions between the block and the cylinder. There is an emphasis on ensuring that all forces and torques are calculated with respect to the same axis.

Bluestribute
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform, solid cylinder of mass M = 4.22 kg and radius R = 0.36 m with I=1/2(M*R^2) is attached at its axle to a string. The string is wrapped around a small frictionless pulley (I=0) and is attached to a hanging block of mass 1.69 kg. You release the objects from rest. Assume the cylinder rolls without slipping. What is the acceleration of the block


Homework Equations



I=1/2(M*R^2)
a(x)=a(y)


The Attempt at a Solution



block
Tension=M(b)*(g-a)

cylinder
∑X: Tension-ƒs=M(c)*a
∑Torque (C.O.M in center of cylinder): ƒsR+M(c)g2R=I[itex]\alpha[/itex]

I'm assuming, on the cylinder, normal and weight offset, so N=M(c)g, and because the normal makes contact at the bottom of the cylinder, the distance is the diameter (or 2R in the torque calculation).

ƒs=Tension-M(c)*a

Back to Torque, subbing for tension and static friction, inertia and angular acceleration in terms of linear acceleration (and canceling out on the I[itex]\alpha[/itex] side):

(M(b)*(g-a))R-(M(c)*a*R)+M(c)g2R=(M(c)*a)/2
M(b)gR + M(c)g2R = a((M(c)/2) + M(b)R + M(c)R)

So, substituting in the given numbers, I get:

((1.69*9.81*0.36) + (4.22*9.81*0.72)) / ((0.5*4.22) + (1.69*0.36) + (4.22*0.36)) = a

Basically, I solve for tension using the block. Then I solve for static friction using the sum of forces in the X direction of the cylinder. Then I solve for linear acceleration using torques of the cylinder, which is just the normal (with a radius of 2R) and static friction. Answers I've gotten somehow:

1 Incorrect. (Try 1) 0.36 m/s/s
2 Incorrect. (Try 2) 36.96 m/s/s
3 Incorrect. (Try 3) 2.62 m/s/s
4 Incorrect. (Try 4) 1.41 m/s/s
5 Incorrect. (Try 5) 2.13 m/s/s
6 Incorrect. (Try 6) 2.67 m/s/s
7 Incorrect. (Try 7) 8.44 m/s/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
7 tries with wildly different values - you have made a mistake in your algebra or reasoning. Are you sure you understand the physics involved?

Note: in
M(b)gR + M(c)g2R = a((M(c)/2) + M(b)R + M(c)R)​
... the dimensions don't match. Typo?

Recheck and go step by step - likely place to mess up is in the treatment of "rolling without slipping".

Try simplifying your notation to make your maths clearer - say make m the falling mass and M the cylinder mass: avoids subscripts.

I think you have (at least) misplaced a minus sign - check that your vector directions are consistent.
I'd choose the +ve direction as the direction of the linear acceleration you expect.
 
Last edited:
Bluestribute said:

The Attempt at a Solution



block
Tension=M(b)*(g-a)

cylinder
∑X: Tension-ƒs=M(c)*a
∑Torque (C.O.M in center of cylinder): ƒsR+M(c)g2R=I[itex]\alpha[/itex]

I'm assuming, on the cylinder, normal and weight offset, so N=M(c)g, and because the normal makes contact at the bottom of the cylinder, the distance is the diameter (or 2R in the torque calculation).


The equation in red is wrong.
If you consider the torque with respect to the C.O.M you do not have the second term.
If you consider the torque with respect to the instantaneous axis, the torque of fs is zero, and the torque of gravity is not M(c)2gR and the moment of inertia is not 0.5 M(c) R2.

ehild
 
Really? If the C.O.M is at the center, and the second term is the normal, wouldn't it still count for torque since the contact isn't at the C.O.M., but rather the ground? Or does that not matter because it goes through the center anyways? Lemme try setting static friction equal to torque (?), and if that doesn't work and I still need help, I rewrite everything so it's easier to follow.
 
Ok, now I got the same answer twice in a row so where am I going wrong now?

M[itex]_{}c[/itex] = Mass Cylinder = 4.22 kg
M[itex]_{}b[/itex] = Mass Block = 1.69 kg
R = 0.36 m
I = 0.5*M*R[itex]^{}2[/itex]

∑[itex]\tau[/itex] = ƒs*R = I*(a/R)
ƒsR = Fτ - M[itex]_{}c[/itex]*a

Fτ*R - M[itex]_{}c[/itex]*a*R = I*(a/R)

Now, using the block to get the tension:
Fτ = M[itex]_{}b[/itex]*(g+a)

Substituting that into the torque equation:
M[itex]_{}b[/itex]*(g+a)*R - M[itex]_{}c[/itex]*a*R = I*(a/R)

Now getting acceleration onto one side (and factored out):
M[itex]_{}b[/itex]*g*R = a((I/R) + M[itex]_{}c[/itex]*R - M[itex]_{}b[/itex]*R)

What am I doing wrong?
 
Bluestribute said:
Really? If the C.O.M is at the center, and the second term is the normal, wouldn't it still count for torque since the contact isn't at the C.O.M., but rather the ground? Or does that not matter because it goes through the center anyways? Lemme try setting static friction equal to torque (?), and if that doesn't work and I still need help, I rewrite everything so it's easier to follow.

Really. Your torque equation is wrong. Decide what is the axis with respect you determine the torque of all forces. You can not calculate the torque of one force with respect to one axis, the torque of the other force with respect to an other axis and then add them.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K