Falling question about terminal velocity

AI Thread Summary
Terminal velocity is not 9.81 m/s; this value represents the acceleration due to gravity. The actual terminal velocity varies based on an object's weight, shape, and size, as air resistance plays a significant role. When an object reaches terminal velocity, the force of gravity equals the air resistance, resulting in a constant falling speed. While all objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum, terminal speeds differ greatly in real-world conditions due to air resistance. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately assessing the impact of free-fall scenarios.
Robertmunch
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys I have a question.

Terminal velocity is 9.81mps correct? Which converts to basically 35kmph so does that mean hitting the ground from free fall after jumping out of an air plane would have the same effect as hitting a wall or something immobile and hard at 35kmph?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Terminal velocity is not 9.81 m/s, it is the acceleration due to gravity that is 9.81 m/s^2. The terminal velocity acquired depends on the weight that is falling out of the airplane.
But in the case that there is some arbitary object with terminal velocity 9.81 m/s, the effect of having it fall to the ground and having it collide with an immobile wall, will be the same; the momentum imparted will be 9.81×mass in both cases.
 
Oh I had a brain fart I guess. I thought I remembered a demonstration from physics class where the teach dropped 2 objects of different mass and they both hit the ground at the same time (obv the shape of the object would make a difference because of air resistance)
 
Robertmunch said:
Oh I had a brain fart I guess. I thought I remembered a demonstration from physics class where the teach dropped 2 objects of different mass and they both hit the ground at the same time (obv the shape of the object would make a difference because of air resistance)
The experiment was to demonstrate that all objects (at the same distance above the Earth's surface) will fall at the same rate regardless of their mass, assuming that you can neglect air resistance. Objects are chosen so than the effect of air resistance is negligible over the fall.
Terminal velocity occurs when air resistance comes into play. It is determined by the the relationship between an object's size, shape and mass. Air resistance increases with velocity, so as the falling object accelerates, the air resistance increases, at some point the air resistance equals the force of gravity trying to accelerate the object, it has reached terminal velocity and just continues to fall at a set speed. Because of the above mentioned factors, terminal speeds for various objects can vary greatly. ( the terminal speed for a ball bearing will be greater than that of a feather even if they had the same mass).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top