Falling thin rod and angular speed

AI Thread Summary
A 1.80 m long thin rod is balanced vertically and begins to fall without slipping at its base. To determine its angular speed just before it hits the floor, the discussion suggests using conservation of energy principles. Participants emphasize the importance of considering both translational and rotational kinetic energy in the calculations. The problem requires a clear understanding of energy transformations as the rod falls. The key focus is on correctly applying the conservation of energy to find the angular speed.
wondermoose
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1.80 m long thing rod is balanced vertically on its tip on the floor. It starts to fall and its lower end does not slip. What is its angular speed just before it hits the floor?


Homework Equations


1/3ML^2
L=mvr


The Attempt at a Solution


When I first started this problem I had a better grasp, but as I started thinking about it I'm pretty sure I got further away. I started finding accelerations and velocities instead of getting back to the angular speed part of the problem. Now I'm trying to figure out how to actually do the problem. What is the first step?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wondermoose said:

Homework Statement


A 1.80 m long thing rod is balanced vertically on its tip on the floor. It starts to fall and its lower end does not slip. What is its angular speed just before it hits the floor?


Homework Equations


1/3ML^2
L=mvr


The Attempt at a Solution


When I first started this problem I had a better grasp, but as I started thinking about it I'm pretty sure I got further away. I started finding accelerations and velocities instead of getting back to the angular speed part of the problem. Now I'm trying to figure out how to actually do the problem. What is the first step?

Thanks.
If the lower end does not slip, then you can treat it as a frictionless pivot. I would approach this problem using conservation of energy.
 
Can you explain that a little further? I attempted to use conservation energy, but apparently I'm missing something somewhere along the way and not doing the problem correctly at all. Am I going to find the total kinetic energy of the rod, maybe some kind of K(transitional) + K(rotational) equation?

Thanks
 
wondermoose said:
Can you explain that a little further? I attempted to use conservation energy, but apparently I'm missing something somewhere along the way and not doing the problem correctly at all. Am I going to find the total kinetic energy of the rod, maybe some kind of K(transitional) + K(rotational) equation?

Thanks
At the beginning, just for the rod falls, what form is the energy in?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top