Feasibility of fission reactor at centre of Earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around J. Marvin Herndon's proposal of a fission reactor at the Earth's core to explain the geomagnetic field. Critics argue that gravitational forces at the Earth's center would prevent heavy elements from separating as Herndon suggests. The inner core, composed of solid material under extreme pressure, generates heat primarily through the radioactivity of isotopes like potassium-40, which some believe is the main source of core heat after initial cooling. The conversation also touches on the nature of the inner core, emphasizing that it remains solid due to the behavior of seismic waves, and discusses the potential for fission in solid uranium under specific conditions, highlighting the role of moderators in nuclear reactions.
verdigris
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
There's a a paper by J Marvin Herndon about the feasibility of a fission reactor about 5 miles wide at the centre of the Earth,which could generate the geomagnetic field.Someone said in New Scientist magazine that because gravitational forces are nearly zero at the Earth's centre then the heavy chemicals mentioned by Hearndon wouldn't separate out on the basis of density as he suggests.

http://www.understandearth.com/Herndon%20JGG93.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Quite right indeed. Moreover the inner core is solid under the extreme pressure. However, all the unstable isotopes anywhere within the Earth, perhaps most abundantly 40K just continue their usual radioactivity and thus generate heat. Some think that this process is the main cause of the heat of the core after initial cooling.

Others have other ideas of course.

qhttp://nujournal.net/core.pdf[/URL]
Just showing it for educational purposes, how far one can go scaremongering in order to get into the limelight.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andre said:
"the inner core is solid under the extreme pressure. "

Solid lumps of uranium do naturally undergo fission such as those found in 1972 in a mine at Oklo, Gabon.But the neutrons need to be slowed down (at Oklo water was the moderating material).There are many elements that can act as moderators - carbon is one.Also the core of the Earth does not have to be solid if the core temperature is high enough.Some moderating materials have atoms displaced by neutrons and these atoms stay in the moderating material with high potential energy that can suddenly be released by a temperature rise(Wigner enrgy that caused the fire at Windscale).
 
Last edited:
verdigris said:
Andre said:
Also the core of the Earth does not have to be solid if the core temperature is high enough.

The inner core is solid because s-waves travel through; the p-wave loses energy in the form of an s-wave at the liquid/solid, outer/inner core boundary. This happens because p and so-called sv- waves form a coupled system.
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Back
Top