A Fermi-Dirac statistics, finding all electron configurations

sigint00
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I'm having trouble understanding this example: https://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter2/ch2_5.htm#2_5_2

In this system of 20 electrons with equidistant energy levels, how is it known that there are only 24 possible configurations, and how are those configurations found?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By counting. You can set up fancy sums, but ultimately it is just a matter of counting.
If you want a systematic approach, sort them by energy of the highest occupied level for example, then by occupancy of that level, then by energy of the second highest occupied level, ...
Alternatively sort by number of excited electrons.
 
mfb said:
By counting. You can set up fancy sums, but ultimately it is just a matter of counting.
If you want a systematic approach, sort them by energy of the highest occupied level for example, then by occupancy of that level, then by energy of the second highest occupied level, ...
Alternatively sort by number of excited electrons.

So there's no getting around this just being a long process of trial-and-error? or I'm misunderstanding, maybe...
 
24 states, it is not that long, and a computer does it in less than a millisecond.
I'm not aware of a method that is faster than counting the states, but that doesn't mean there can't be such a method.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top