Fermi Golden Rule - Beta Decay

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Fermi golden rule to beta decay processes, specifically focusing on the derivation of the decay rate and the associated phase space considerations. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and assumptions involved in calculating the decay rate, addressing both theoretical and technical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for the decay rate using the Fermi golden rule and discusses the reaction amplitude and density of states.
  • Another participant identifies two mistakes in the initial calculation, emphasizing the need to include the neutrino phase space and correcting the expression for the derivative of momentum with respect to energy.
  • Further elaboration on the phase space element for both the electron and neutrino is provided, leading to a revised expression for the decay rate.
  • A question is raised regarding the integration over the neutrino energy, prompting clarification about the integration process and the use of a delta function for energy conservation.
  • Participants discuss the implications of integrating over the neutrino energy and the resulting expressions, with one participant noting the importance of being rigorous in the mathematical treatment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the initial calculations, with some corrections and clarifications being made. However, there is no consensus reached on the initial approach, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact formulation of the decay rate.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the mass of the neutrino and the treatment of phase space elements. The discussion also highlights the dependency on specific definitions and the integration steps involved in deriving the decay rate.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
We consider the following beta decay:

^A_ZX \rightarrow ^A_{Z+1} Y + e^{-} + \nu_e

The Fermi golden rule is given by:

\Gamma = \frac{2\pi}{\hbar} |A_{fi}|^2 \frac{dN}{dE_f}

Reaction amplitude is given by ##A_{fi} = G_F M_{nucl} ## while density of states is given by ##dN = \frac{4 \pi p^2 dp}{(2\pi)^3} ## and ##\frac{dp}{dE} = \frac{1}{2}##.

Putting all these together, it gives :

\Gamma = \frac{2\pi}{\hbar} G_p^2M_{nucl}^2 \frac{p^2}{2\pi^2} \frac{1}{2} = \frac{\pi}{2\hbar}G_p^2 M_{nucl}^2 p^2

d\Gamma = \frac{\pi}{\hbar}G_p^2 M_{nucl}^2 p~\ dpI'm not sure how the text derived this.

ifzme9.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two mistakes in your calculation:

1) You are forgetting the neutrino phase space ##\frac{d^3p_\nu}{(2\pi)^3}##
2) It is not true that ##dp/dE=1/2##. In fact, ##p=\sqrt{E^2-m^2}## and hence ##dp/dE=E/p \Rightarrow pdp=EdE##. This is often a useful relation to keep in mind.

Then you have to do the following. Consider the phase space element for both electron and neutrino:
$$
dN=\frac{d^3p_e}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{d^3p_\nu}{(2\pi)^3}=\frac{4\pi p_e^2dp_e}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{4\pi p_\nu^2dp_\nu}{(2\pi)^3}=\frac{4\pi p_e^2dp_e}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{4\pi E_\nu^2dE_\nu}{(2\pi)^3},
$$
where I considered the neutrino as massless (##p_\nu=E_\nu##). Integrating out the energy of the neutrino you are left with:
$$
dN=\frac{4}{(2\pi)^4}E_\nu^2p_e^2dp_e=\frac{4}{(2\pi)^4}(Q-E_e)^2p_e^2dp_e.
$$
Therefore:
$$
d\Gamma=2\pi G_F^2\left|M_\text{nucl}\right|^2\frac{4}{(2\pi)^4}(Q-E_e)^2p_e^2dp_e=\frac{G_F^2}{2\pi^3}\left|M_\text{nucl}\right|^2(Q-E_e)^2p_e^2dp_e.
$$
Which is the result you are looking for. Note that I used ##\hbar=1##.
I hope this is what you were looking for.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unscientific
Einj said:
There are two mistakes in your calculation:

1) You are forgetting the neutrino phase space ##\frac{d^3p_\nu}{(2\pi)^3}##
2) It is not true that ##dp/dE=1/2##. In fact, ##p=\sqrt{E^2-m^2}## and hence ##dp/dE=E/p \Rightarrow pdp=EdE##. This is often a useful relation to keep in mind.

Then you have to do the following. Consider the phase space element for both electron and neutrino:
$$
dN=\frac{d^3p_e}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{d^3p_\nu}{(2\pi)^3}=\frac{4\pi p_e^2dp_e}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{4\pi p_\nu^2dp_\nu}{(2\pi)^3}=\frac{4\pi p_e^2dp_e}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{4\pi E_\nu^2dE_\nu}{(2\pi)^3},
$$
where I considered the neutrino as massless (##p_\nu=E_\nu##). Integrating out the energy of the neutrino you are left with:
$$
dN=\frac{4}{(2\pi)^4}E_\nu^2p_e^2dp_e=\frac{4}{(2\pi)^4}(Q-E_e)^2p_e^2dp_e.
$$
Therefore:
$$
d\Gamma=2\pi G_F^2\left|M_\text{nucl}\right|^2\frac{4}{(2\pi)^4}(Q-E_e)^2p_e^2dp_e=\frac{G_F^2}{2\pi^3}\left|M_\text{nucl}\right|^2(Q-E_e)^2p_e^2dp_e.
$$
Which is the result you are looking for. Note that I used ##\hbar=1##.
I hope this is what you were looking for.

Brilliant, thank you! It's people like you that make physics forums a great resource for everyone.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Einj
Einj said:
Integrating out the energy of the neutrino you are left with:
$$
dN=\frac{4}{(2\pi)^4}E_\nu^2p_e^2dp_e=\frac{4}{(2\pi)^4}(Q-E_e)^2p_e^2dp_e.
$$

Which is the result you are looking for. Note that I used ##\hbar=1##.
I hope this is what you were looking for.

Just a quick question: why is ##dE_v = 1## ?
 
No, it's not one. I simply integrated over it. If you want to be rigorous I should have written ##d^2N=f(E_\nu,p_e)dp_edp_\nu##, i.e. a double differential. In the second step I integrated over the energy of the neutrino and so I arrived to a single differential.
 
Einj said:
No, it's not one. I simply integrated over it. If you want to be rigorous I should have written ##d^2N=f(E_\nu,p_e)dp_edp_\nu##, i.e. a double differential. In the second step I integrated over the energy of the neutrino and so I arrived to a single differential.

Then won't the result become: ## \int E_v^2 dE_v = \frac{1}{3} E_v^3##?
 
Sorry, maybe I've been a little bit too implicit. Inside the matrix element you always have a delta function for conservation of energy. Therefore you have should have something like:
$$
\int dE_\nu E_\nu^2\delta(E_\nu+E_e-Q)=(Q-E_e)^2.
$$
Is it clear? Sorry for being obscure :P
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unscientific
Einj said:
Sorry, maybe I've been a little bit too implicit. Inside the matrix element you always have a delta function for conservation of energy. Therefore you have should have something like:
$$
\int dE_\nu E_\nu^2\delta(E_\nu+E_e-Q)=(Q-E_e)^2.
$$
Is it clear? Sorry for being obscure :P

Got it, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K