Feynman diagram interpretation - 2 electrons in and 2 electrons out

catkin
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello :smile:

The question is from "Advanced Physics" by Adams and Allday. It is from section 9 "The Physics of Particles", "Practice Exam Questions". It is question 11, part c. The level of this study is between school and University.

Figure 9.5 represents a simple particle interaction. State the nature of the interaction and describe what happens to the particles involved. State three properties of the exchange particle.

[Figure 9.5 is in the attachment]

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


The particles in the interaction are leptons (electrons) so it must be a weak force interaction.

It looks like nothing happens to the particles involved! The same particles are present before and after the interaction (possibly at different energies).

It is not clear which way the exchange particle moves and there is no transfer of charge.

Because there is no transfer of charge and the weak force is acting, I guess the only unidentified particle must be the uncharged weak force exchange particle, the Z0.

I further guess that the directionless nature of the reaction means the exchange particle must be one that is its own anti-particle; again the Z0.

I don't like guessing -- it means lack of understanding :frown:

Illumination gratefully received.

As for the three properties, I don't think we are required to recall actual figures so how about: massive (hence very unstable), uncharged, own anti-partcle?

Best

Charles
 

Attachments

  • Figure 9.5.png
    Figure 9.5.png
    4 KB · Views: 426
Physics news on Phys.org
catkin said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The particles in the interaction are leptons (electrons) so it must be a weak force interaction.

Nope. The squiggly line represents a photon. W and Z bosons are represented by straight dashed lines.

It looks like nothing happens to the particles involved! The same particles are present before and after the interaction (possibly at different energies).

When two billiard balls collide, the same balls are present before and after the interaction. Does that mean that nothing happens to them??

It is not clear which way the exchange particle moves and there is no transfer of charge.

You don't need to know the direction of motion of the exchange particle. But you're right, there is no transfer of charge.
 
Thanks Tom :-)

Duh! I didn't consider that it might be an electromagnetic force interaction! We've been so focussed on weak and strong I missed the obvious.

Best

Charles
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top