Fictious force: Cylinder on an Accelerating Plank

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between angular acceleration and linear acceleration in the context of a cylinder on an accelerating plank. Participants express confusion over the equation α'R = a', questioning its dimensional correctness. Clarifications are made that linear acceleration (a) and angular acceleration (α) are distinct, with the correct relationships being s = rθ, v = rω, and a = rα. The use of unconventional notation in the problem statement contributes to the confusion. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the differences between angular and linear quantities in physics.
Leb
Messages
87
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Problem is described in the picture
Cylinder on an accelerating plank.jpg

I do not understand how can \alpha^{'}R=a^{'}.
The dimensions do not seem correct. Angular velocity x distance from the origin = tangential velocity, is that correct ? How can this equal acceleration then ?

3. Attempt to solution

I think that \alpha^{'}R=a^{'} would hold only if we would consider a unit time. That is:
\alpha^{'}R=\frac{d\theta}{dt}R, which, more by knowing the anticipated result in this case, than by logic, gives \frac{d\theta}R = a^{'}dt which is now dimensionally OK, I think...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Leb! :smile:
Leb said:
I do not understand how can \alpha^{'}R=a^{'}.
The dimensions do not seem correct. Angular velocity x distance from the origin = tangential velocity, is that correct ? How can this equal acceleration then ?.

No, a is (linear) acceleration, and α is angular acceleration

s = rθ

v = rω

a = rα :wink:
 
Thanks tiny-tim !
It was strange to see an alpha instead of omega, but since the author was at times using random notation (such a ro, for distance and w for density...) made me forget about usual notation:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top