Field Due to Continuous Distribution of Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Coulomb force between two line charges positioned on the x-axis, with specified charge densities and lengths. The user attempts to derive the electric field at a point a distance D from the end of the first line charge, using integration to express the electric field in terms of the charge density and distance. There is some confusion regarding the limits of integration and the definition of variables, particularly concerning the distance from the first line charge to the point of interest. The user seeks clarification on the correct setup for the integration to accurately find the electric field and subsequently the force between the charges. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly defining distances and limits in the integration process for accurate calculations.
discordplus
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Coulomb force between line charges: a rod of length l1 with line charge density λ1 and a rod of length l2 with line charge density λ2 lie on the x axis. Their ends are separated by a distance D as shown in the figure.

(a) What is the force F between these charges?

diagram: http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Physics/8-022Fall-2004/3A772032-6B74-4D2D-A550-8F0ECFECEDBC/0/pset1.pdf

#7


Homework Equations



E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\int\frac{dq}{r^2}
F = \int E dq



The Attempt at a Solution


So, first I decided to find the field at a point a distance D from the end of line 1. Using the standard x coordinate system, I placed line 1 such that its endpoints are 0, l_{1}.

E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\int\frac{dq}{r^2}

Limits of integration being (0,

Using this and dq = dl_{1}\lambda_{1}, all I need to do is find a function for r in terms of l, which is the distance from 0. Which would be (l_{1} + D) - l.

I renamed (l_{1} + D) as the variable a to make the integration simpler. So now I have:

E = \frac{\lambda_{1}}{4\pi\epsilon}\int \frac{dl}{(a - l)^2}

which is just \frac{\lambda_{1}}{4\pi\epsilon} *\frac{1}{a-l_{1}}

and because a = d + l_{1}

I get the E Field being E = \frac{\lambda_{1}}{4d\pi\epsilon}

Is this correct so far? Clearly my success on the second part depends on that because all I have to do is just integrate the field over the infinitesimal segments of charge over the second line's length yes? And to find that distance d as a function of l it's just ( l - length 1), where l is the distance from the 0 point. I'm just kind of shaky on the first part, finding the field, that's all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the expression of E at the starting point of l2, the distance l1 must appear which is missing in your expression.
Try this one.
dE = k*lambda1*dx/(D+x)^2.
Integrate it from x = 0 to x = l1 and find E.
 
Wait, is x the distance from l1? Because then D + x is the distance from some point on the line to P2 which is what i want. Because my expression actually has d in it? It's just "a" is in terms of D, and i defined my distance variable as from x = 0. I'm not sure, it looks like x+d only works if x is the distance from l1. Or am I misunderstanding something here?
 
You want to find the field due to rod1 at the starting point of rod 2.
So E = k*lambda1*[-(1/(x+D)]. Find the value of E taking the limits from x = D to x= (l1 +D)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top