Find Acceleration Experimentally

  • Thread starter Thread starter Power of One
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
To find acceleration experimentally when dropping an object, two methods are discussed: using kinematic equations and calculating average velocity. The first method yields an acceleration of 16 m/s², while the second method results in 8 m/s², highlighting a discrepancy that raises questions about the adequacy of the given information. The discussion suggests that knowing both initial and final velocities would allow for a more accurate calculation of acceleration. Additionally, applying Newton's second law (F=ma) is proposed as a simpler alternative, requiring only the object's mass and the force upon impact to determine gravitational acceleration. Understanding these methods is crucial for accurate experimental physics.
Power of One
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
You drop an object. You take the time it takes to hit the ground. So you have Δx (displacement) and time.

To find acceleration do you use

xf= xi + Vi t + .5at2
Δ x= Vi t + .5at2
Δ x- Vi t=.5at2
a= 2(Δ x- Vit )/ t2

or do you use

v= Δ x/ Δ t
a= Δ v/ Δ t

Should acceleration come out the same? Why do they differ so much? Take example a Δx of 2m and a time of .5. Using the first equation you get 16 m/s^2. But using the second method, you get 8 m/s^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that you're not given enough information. If you had the initial and final velocity, you could plug into

V_{f} = V_{i} + at

to experimentally find the acceleration.

What would be easier is to use Newton's second law (F=ma) since then you only need to know the object's mass and the force it exerts on the ground upon impact to experimentally determine the value of g.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top