Find an expression for the electric potential at P

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the electric potential at point P due to a uniformly charged rod with linear charge density λ. The key equations used include dV = k * dq / r and λ * dx = dq. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting the limits of integration, which should be from x = 0 to x = L, with the distance r defined as r = √(b² + (a + x)²). A suggested change of variable, u = a + x, is recommended to simplify the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the concepts of linear charge density and its implications
  • Proficiency in using the Coulomb's law constant, k
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about integration techniques for variable substitutions in calculus
  • Explore the use of tables of integrals for solving complex integrals
  • Investigate the implications of changing coordinate systems in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric potentials and charge distributions.

Keithkent09
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
The thin, uniformly charged rod shown in the figure below has a linear charge density λ. Find an expression for the electric potential at P. (Use k_e for ke, lambda for λ, a, b, and L as necessary.)




Homework Equations


dV=k*dq/r
lambda*dx=dq

The Attempt at a Solution


I integrated using the above equations and went from 0 to L. I thought this was the right way to do it but I keep getting the wrong answer.
 

Attachments

  • elecpotential.gif
    elecpotential.gif
    2.8 KB · Views: 884
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Keithkent09.

First: Show us your work and what you got for your integral.
When you integrate your potential equation you are integrating over the
location of charge correct? The integration does not happen from 0 to L. Your
charge location is not from 0 to L do you see? What should it be?
 
the integral of (k*dq)/r=(k*lambda+dx)/r
r=sqrt(b^2+(a+x)^2) so...
k*lambda*dx/(sqrt(b^2+(a+x)^2))...and was not sure what to do after this
 
The next step would be to do the integral. However ...

...here is a suggestion: let x=0 at the point directly below P. That will simplify the integral somewhat. Of course, this will change the limits on x: instead of 0 to L it will be ____ to ____ instead.
 
Will the limits be from 0 to a+L?
Also if x=0 under point P how does that make the integral any easier, does that mean that x is thrown out in the integral and all that remains is the dx?
 
Last edited:
Keithkent09 said:
Will the limits be from 0 to a+L?
If x=0 under point P, then the rod will lie between x=a and x=a+L, right?
Also if x=0 under point P how does that make the integral any easier, does that mean that x is thrown out in the integral and all that remains is the dx?
Well, set up the integral, using the approach you did before:

Homework Equations


dV=k*dq/r
lambda*dx=dq
What expression do you get for the integral in this case?
 
is it just the integral of (k*lambda*dx)/(sqrt(a^2+b^2) from a to a+L?
 
Keithkent09 said:
is it just the integral of (k*lambda*dx)/(sqrt(a^2+b^2) from a to a+L?
Not quite, the (sqrt(a^2+b^2) part is wrong. There should be an x in there somewhere.

Note, this term is equivalent to r, the distance from point P to some point along the wire. The point on the wire would be a distance x from the origin directly below P.
 
Earlier I said that the denominator was sqrt(b^2+(a+x)^2) i do not understand why the placement of x=0 changes that up.
 
  • #10
Never mind, let's go back to your expression which was correct and not confusing you:
Keithkent09 said:
the integral of (k*dq)/r=(k*lambda+dx)/r
r=sqrt(b^2+(a+x)^2) so...
k*lambda*dx/(sqrt(b^2+(a+x)^2))...and was not sure what to do after this
This needs to be integrated from x=0 to x=L.
Try looking it up in a table of integrals.
The following might be useful for doing this integral: try a change of variable, u=a+x.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
582
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K