Find Coeff. of Static Friction of Car on Track

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of static friction for a car on a flat circular track with a radius of 5 meters and a tangential acceleration of 1.7 m/s². The car travels 0.2 of the way around the track before skidding off, with gravity set at 9.8 m/s². The initial approach used the equations Fc=Ff and V²m/r=μmg, leading to an incorrect calculation of μ. The correct coefficient of static friction is determined to be approximately 0.436, but calculation errors were noted as a potential issue in achieving this result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circular motion dynamics
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of frictional forces and coefficients
  • Ability to manipulate kinematic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the centripetal force equation (Fc=V²m/r)
  • Study the relationship between tangential acceleration and velocity in circular motion
  • Learn about the role of static friction in preventing skidding
  • Practice solving problems involving coefficients of friction in circular motion scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of friction in circular motion.

wmrunner24
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car traveling on a flat circular track of radius 5m accelerates uniformly from rest with a tangential acceleration of 1.7m/s^2. The car makes it 0.2 of the way around the track before skidding off. Acceleration of gravity=9.8m/s^s.
What is the coefficient of static friction between the car and the track?


Homework Equations


Fc=V^2m/r
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



So I tried this:
Fc=Ff
V^2m/r=\mumg
v^2/gr=\mu

To determine the velocity at which the car slips, I said V^2=2ax, where x is 2\pir/5.

So I get 4\pia/5g=\mu

It's not correct. Why is that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice solution. I get 0.436, but I'm prone to calculation errors.
 
The online homework system marks it wrong. I can't explain it. Is there another way to do this?
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K