Find electronic force, this one is driving me crazy,

  • Thread starter Thread starter nutriculium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electronic Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force between two copper spheres with a slight difference in charge magnitude between protons and electrons. The original calculations led to an unexpectedly high force value, prompting confusion about the methodology and assumptions, such as whether the spheres are solid or hollow and the distance measurement (center to center vs. edge to edge). Participants noted that the force calculated is not detectable, suggesting that if the charges were truly different, significant effects would be observed. There is also uncertainty regarding the number of atoms in the spheres and how to accurately account for the charge distribution. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of electrostatic calculations and the implications of charge discrepancies.
nutriculium
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
this one comes out of my homework question. I am not asking you guys helping me doing my homework, i had a thought but didn't work at all and i hope someone can tell me what is going on.

question:
Suppose the magnitude of the proton charge differs from the magnitude of the electron charge by a mere 1 part in 10^9, i.e., qp = −qe (1 + 10^−9).
--------------------------
(a) What would be the force between two 2.0-mm-diameter copper spheres 1.8 cm apart? Assume that each copper atom has an equal number of electrons and protons.

(b) Would this amount of force be detectable? What can you conclude from the fact that no such forces are observed?

my method:


1\get Volume of copper ball V = r^3*4(pi )/3
2\get Mass using m = V/density
3\convert Mass to number of mole using mole = m/atomic_mass_cu = m/63.5
4\29*mole*avogadro_constant=29*mole*6.02e23 = total_number_proton = total_number_eletron

since qp = -qe(1+10E-9), qp - qe = -qe(10E-9)
plug in e = 1.6E-19c
than F = Q1Q2/r^2 = (1+10E-9)(qe^2)/r^2=(1+10E-9)(total_number-eletron)(1.6E-19)/r^2

my answer was wrong.
--------------------

also i have no idea why the force is not detectable, someone give a hint please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F shoud be = Q1Q2/r^2 = (1+10E-9)(qe^2)/r^2=(1+10E-9)[(total_number-eletron)(1.6E-19)]^2/r^2

i got F = 3.84N which is an impossibly big number
 
Sounds reasonable, actually. Why do you think that is wrong? I think the whole point of the exercise is to show that if the charges weren't quite the same, you'd really notice.
 
K^2 said:
Sounds reasonable, actually. Why do you think that is wrong? I think the whole point of the exercise is to show that if the charges weren't quite the same, you'd really notice.

thank you for reply. I submitted my answer and the system says i was wrong.

also i don't get why this force can not be observed
 
well, the wording seems a bit wanky, considering that a sphere is hollow (a ball is solid), making it difficult to determine the number of copper atoms. is the sphere an atomic thickness thick?
because the gap is much larger than the sphere/ball things, you prolly don't have to integrate, but i had to integrate for most of the sphere problems i had to do in electrodynamics/statics... taht could be it...

another ambiguity is if the distance is center to center or edge to edge.

assuming center to center point charges i got 8e-15 N, which would induce an acceleration around 2E-10 m/s^2 aka really really slow... and getting slower as r dominates.,, but still detectable using a decent interferometer.

i figured the number of atoms and an extra 29*1.6E-19 C charge per billion atoms (using mass, density and Avag.#).

but my answer is way off nutriclium's, so there is reason to doubt my calculations.
 
dipstik said:
well, the wording seems a bit wanky, considering that a sphere is hollow (a ball is solid), making it difficult to determine the number of copper atoms. is the sphere an atomic thickness thick?
because the gap is much larger than the sphere/ball things, you prolly don't have to integrate, but i had to integrate for most of the sphere problems i had to do in electrodynamics/statics... taht could be it...

another ambiguity is if the distance is center to center or edge to edge.

assuming center to center point charges i got 8e-15 N, which would induce an acceleration around 2E-10 m/s^2 aka really really slow... and getting slower as r dominates.,, but still detectable using a decent interferometer.

i figured the number of atoms and an extra 29*1.6E-19 C charge per billion atoms (using mass, density and Avag.#).

but my answer is way off nutriclium's, so there is reason to doubt my calculations.

do you use the same method as i do? I will check my calculation again anyway
I took the this question as the objects are balls in stead of hollowed sphere. for every Cu atom there is one free electron, maybe this is the key to approach?
 
about distance, i think it is edge to edge given that diameter isprovided
 
Back
Top