Find expression for electric field from magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electric field expression from a given magnetic field that varies with the z-coordinate. The magnetic field is defined as B = j B0 cos(kz - ωt), and the electric field in Cartesian coordinates is expressed as E = i Ex + j Ey + k Ez, with Ey and Ez initially set to zero. A participant identifies a mistake in the assumption of Ez being both zero and non-zero, clarifying that Ez should equal (ωB0)/k. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to use the equation ∇×B = μ0ε0∂E/∂t to solve for the electric field, given the absence of currents.
charlief
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a region of space, the magnetic field depends on the co-ordinate ##z## and is given by $$\mathbf{B} = \hat{\jmath} B_0 \cos \left(kz - \omega t \right)$$ where ##k## is the wave number, ##\omega## is the angular frequency, and ##B_0## is a constant.
The Electric Field in Cartesian coordinates is ##\mathbf{E} = \hat{\imath} E_x + \hat{\jmath} E_y + \hat{k} E_z##. Given that ##E_y = E_z = 0## and ##E_z = \omega B_0/k## at ##z = t = 0##, determine an expression for ##E_x##.

Homework Equations



##\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the cross product rule, I changed ##\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}## to ##-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \times \nabla = \mathbf{E}##. Calculated ## -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = -\hat{\jmath} B_0\omega\sin(kz - \omega t)##. Then working out the cross product I got ##\mathbf{E} = \hat{\imath} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}[-B_0\omega\sin(kz - \omega t)] = -\hat{\imath} B_0 k \omega \cos(k z - \omega t)##. So inputting ##z = t = 0## clearly gives ##B_0 \omega k## instead of ## \omega B_0 / k##.

I cannot see where in my method I have gone wrong and I am not sure this method is correct?
Thank you so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you say that E_{z}=0 and then E_{z}=(\omega B_{0})/k. You can't say that the z component of electric field is zero and non zero at the same time... clear that confusion then I'll solve your problem.
 
AhmirMalik said:
Why do you say that E_{z}=0 and then E_{z}=(\omega B_{0})/k. You can't say that the z component of electric field is zero and non zero at the same time... clear that confusion then I'll solve your problem.
Apologies it was a typo, I meant "##E_y = E_z = 0## and ##E_x = (\omega B_0)/k##"
 
Oh.. then you just have to use this;

\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{B}=\mu_{0}\vec{J}+\mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}

Since you don't have any currents, so first term on the right hand side is zero, so you are left with;

\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{B}=\mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}

which is easy to solve.
 
  • Like
Likes charlief
AhmirMalik said:
Oh.. then you just have to use this;

\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{B}=\mu_{0}\vec{J}+\mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}

Since you don't have any currents, so first term on the right hand side is zero, so you are left with;

\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{B}=\mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}

which is easy to solve.
AhmirMalik said:
Oh.. then you just have to use this;

\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{B}=\mu_{0}\vec{J}+\mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}

Since you don't have any currents, so first term on the right hand side is zero, so you are left with;

\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{B}=\mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}

which is easy to solve.
Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top