Find Initial Speed of Porsche Using Inelastic Collision

AI Thread Summary
To find the initial speed of a Porsche using inelastic collision principles, it's essential to apply the momentum conservation equation, which states that the total momentum before the collision equals the total momentum after. The problem is framed as a 2D scenario, requiring separate momentum calculations for both North/South and East/West directions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct equations and values, noting that the initial setup may seem confusing due to the lack of time information. Additionally, the final speed of the combined vehicles post-collision can be determined using accelerated motion formulas, focusing on distance and acceleration without time. This approach will clarify the solution process for the problem at hand.
7skk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


blah blah blah

Homework Equations


momentum = momentum'
mv + mv = (m1+m2)v
(Uk)N = friction force


The Attempt at a Solution



It's hard to find how to start with randomly given values.
Thank you so much for your help! :D
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a 2D problem so you must write two headings for North/South and East/West. Then write that "momentum before = momentum after". Follow that up with an "mv" for each moving object in each part. Then put in your numbers. If you are still having trouble, show us your work and someone will be pleased to pitch in and help!
 
No, I don't think any of it makes sense. Even the
1380kg v + 2304kg v = 3684kg v
can't be right because before the collision you don't have two vehicles moving in either the north/south or east/west direction. Got to write the two headings and two separate equations!

You do have to find the speed of the pair of them after the collision from the friction and distance information given. That is an ordinary 1D accelerated motion problem, a little complicated because there is no time info. Do you have the accelerated motion formula with v's, d and a but no t? That is perfect for the job. If you don't have it you could derive it by solving Vf = Vi + at for t and subbing into
d = Vi*t+.5*a*t^2. Or you could sketch the v vs t graph and use the fact that the area under the graph is the distance.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top